From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: fix confusion around GFP_* flags and blk_get_request
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:38:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514143802.GA28197@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509075408.16388-1-hch@lst.de>
Jens, any comments?
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:54:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series sorts out the mess around how we use gfp flags in the
> block layer get_request interface.
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - don't switch to GFP_NOIO for allocations in blk_get_request.
> blk_get_request is used by the multipath code in potentially dead lock
> prone areas, so this will need a separate audit and maybe a flag.
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-09 7:54 fix confusion around GFP_* flags and blk_get_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-09 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] scsi/osd: remove the gfp argument to osd_start_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09 7:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: fix __get_request documentation Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09 7:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: sanitize blk_get_request calling conventions Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09 7:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: pass an explicit gfp_t to get_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09 7:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09 7:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: consistently use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_NORECLAIM Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-05-14 14:54 ` fix confusion around GFP_* flags and blk_get_request Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180514143802.GA28197@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).