From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] umem: don't override the queue_lock
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:02:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114160219.28328-13-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181114160219.28328-1-hch@lst.de>
The umem card->lock and the block layer queue_lock are used for entirely
different resources. Stop using card->lock as the block layer
queue_lock.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/block/umem.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/umem.c b/drivers/block/umem.c
index be3e3ab79950..8a27b5adc2b3 100644
--- a/drivers/block/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/block/umem.c
@@ -888,8 +888,7 @@ static int mm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
card->biotail = &card->bio;
spin_lock_init(&card->lock);
- card->queue = blk_alloc_queue_node(GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE,
- &card->lock);
+ card->queue = blk_alloc_queue_node(GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
if (!card->queue)
goto failed_alloc;
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 16:02 remove more legacy request leftover Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/16] block: remove QUEUE_FLAG_BYPASS and ->bypass Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/16] block: remove deadline __deadline manipulation helpers Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/16] block: don't hold the queue_lock over blk_abort_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/16] block: use atomic bitops for ->queue_flags Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-15 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/16] block: remove queue_lockdep_assert_held Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/16] block-iolatency: remove the unused lock argument to rq_qos_throttle Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/16] block: update a few comments for the legacy request removal Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/16] block: remove a few unused exports Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/16] blk-cgroup: consolidate error handling in blkcg_init_queue Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/16] blk-cgroup: move locking into blkg_destroy_all Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/16] drbd: don't override the queue_lock Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-11-15 6:59 ` [PATCH 12/16] umem: " Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 13/16] mmc: simplify queue initialization Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 17:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-11-15 9:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 7:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 14/16] mmc: stop abusing the request queue_lock pointer Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 17:56 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-11-15 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 7:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 15/16] block: remove the lock argument to blk_alloc_queue_node Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 7:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 16:02 ` [PATCH 16/16] block: remove the queue_lock indirection Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 7:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-15 19:14 ` remove more legacy request leftover Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 19:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181114160219.28328-13-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).