linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1: Panic at boot
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:19:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190108131913.GA6677@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da851333-eadd-163a-8c78-e1f4ec5ec857@deltatee.com>

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:41:06PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> I found a regression in v5.0-rc1 this morning. My system panics on boot.
> I've attached a log of the panic.
> 
> I bisected to find the problematic commit is:
> 
> Fixes: 9d037ad707ed ("block: remove req->timeout_list")
> 
> But it makes no sense to me why this commit would cause a problem like
> this. I've attached a bisect log. I've also tested v5.0-rc1 with this
> commit reverted and that boots fine.
> 
> The traceback seems to indicate the problem is on the bip_get_seed()
> line in t10_pi_complete(). Which suggests that bio_integrity() is
> returning NULL.

Very odd.  Can you try an experiment?  Can you add padding the size
of struct timer_list to struct request to check if that makes the
problem go away?  Then move the padding from the where the field
was to the end and see if that still "helps"?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-08 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-07 19:41 Regression in v5.0-rc1: Panic at boot Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-08 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-01-08 17:24   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-08 13:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-01-08 17:31   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-08 20:54 ` Logan Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190108131913.GA6677@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).