From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on handling managed IRQs when hotplugging CPUs
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:16:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190205151632.GA28064@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0de6dae8-1234-3e3f-d8f3-2d8de47b7f9e@suse.com>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:10:47PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 2/5/19 3:52 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Whichever layer dispatched the IO to a CPU specific context should
> > be the one to wait for its completion. That should be blk-mq for most
> > block drivers.
> >
> Indeed.
> But we don't provide any mechanisms for that ATM, right?
>
> Maybe this would be a topic fit for LSF/MM?
Right, there's nothing handling this now, and sounds like it'd be a good
discussion to bring to the storage track.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-05 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f6f6e031-8b79-439d-c2af-8d3e76f30710@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20190129154433.GF15302@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <757902fc-a9ea-090b-7853-89944a0ce1b5@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20190129172059.GC17132@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <3fe63dab-0791-f476-69c4-9866b70e8520@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901301338170.5537@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
2019-01-31 17:48 ` Question on handling managed IRQs when hotplugging CPUs John Garry
2019-02-01 15:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-02-01 21:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-04 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-02-05 13:24 ` John Garry
2019-02-05 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-02-05 15:09 ` John Garry
2019-02-05 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2019-02-05 15:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-02-05 15:27 ` John Garry
2019-02-05 18:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-06 9:21 ` John Garry
2019-02-06 13:34 ` Benjamin Block
2019-02-05 15:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-02-05 15:16 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190205151632.GA28064@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).