From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=ntoj=XG=vger.kernel.org=linux-block-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BA6C5ACAE
	for <linux-block@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AC62087E
	for <linux-block@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727497AbfIKKhk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-block@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:37:40 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38126 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725616AbfIKKhj (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-block@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:37:39 -0400
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id AA8B368B02; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:37:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:37:36 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Respect the device's maximum segment size
Message-ID: <20190911103736.GB28124@lst.de>
References: <20190909125658.30559-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20190909125658.30559-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20190909161331.GA19650@lst.de> <20190909191911.GC23804@mithrandir> <TYAPR01MB454470364B682B9BF708E557D8B60@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB454470364B682B9BF708E557D8B60@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-block.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 02:03:17AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> I'm sorry for causing this trouble on your environment. I have a proposal to
> resolve this issue. The mmc_host struct will have a new caps2 flag
> like MMC_CAP2_MERGE_CAPABLE and add a condition into the queue.c like below.
> 
> +	if (host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_MERGE_CAPABLE &&
> +	    host->max_segs < MMC_DMA_MAP_MERGE_SEGMENTS &&
> 	    dma_get_merge_boundary(mmc_dev(host)))
> 		host->can_dma_map_merge = 1;
> 	else
> 		host->can_dma_map_merge = 0;
> 
> After that, all mmc controllers disable the feature as default, and if a mmc
> controller has such capable, the host driver should set the flag.
> Ulf, is such a patch acceptable for v5.4-rcN? Anyway, I'll submit such a patch later.

FYI, I'd love to see such a patch, even if only as a temporary band-aid
so that I don't have to revert the series before sending the pull
request to Linus.