linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bdev: Refresh bdev size for disks without partitioning
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:40:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021094016.GD17810@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f77bed8f-16a7-dc96-d006-41c34e86eff0@cloud.ionos.com>

On Mon 21-10-19 11:27:36, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/21/19 11:12 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 21-10-19 10:49:54, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 10/21/19 10:38 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Currently, block device size in not updated on second and further open
> > > > for block devices where partition scan is disabled. This is particularly
> > > > annoying for example for DVD drives as that means block device size does
> > > > not get updated once the media is inserted into a drive if the device is
> > > > already open when inserting the media. This is actually always the case
> > > > for example when pktcdvd is in use.
> > > > 
> > > > Fix the problem by revalidating block device size on every open even for
> > > > devices with partition scan disabled.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > > > ---
> > > >    fs/block_dev.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> > > >    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> > > > index 88c6d35ec71d..d612468ee66b 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> > > > @@ -1403,11 +1403,7 @@ static void flush_disk(struct block_device *bdev, bool kill_dirty)
> > > >    		       "resized disk %s\n",
> > > >    		       bdev->bd_disk ? bdev->bd_disk->disk_name : "");
> > > >    	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	if (!bdev->bd_disk)
> > > > -		return;
> > > > -	if (disk_part_scan_enabled(bdev->bd_disk))
> > > > -		bdev->bd_invalidated = 1;
> > > > +	bdev->bd_invalidated = 1;
> > > >    }
> > > >    /**
> > > > @@ -1514,10 +1510,15 @@ static void __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part);
> > > >    static void bdev_disk_changed(struct block_device *bdev, bool invalidate)
> > > >    {
> > > > -	if (invalidate)
> > > > -		invalidate_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
> > > > -	else
> > > > -		rescan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
> > > > +	if (disk_part_scan_enabled(bdev->bd_disk)) {
> > > > +		if (invalidate)
> > > > +			invalidate_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			rescan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
> > > Maybe use the new common helper to replace above.
> > What do you mean exactly? Because there's only this place that has the code
> > pattern here...
> 
> The above looks same as the new function.
> 
> +static void bdev_disk_changed(struct block_device *bdev, bool invalidate)
> +{
> +	if (invalidate)
> +		invalidate_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
> +	else
> +		rescan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
> +}
> 
> So maybe just call it in the 'if' branch, am I misunderstand something?

I think you misparsed the diff ;) The code that you mention as duplicated
just gets reindented by the patch.

> static void bdev_disk_changed(struct block_device *bdev, bool invalidate)
> {
> 	if (disk_part_scan_enabled(bdev->bd_disk))	
> 		bdev_disk_changed(bdev, invalidate)
> 	else {
> 		check_disk_size_change(bdev->bd_disk, bdev, !invalidate);
> 		bdev->bd_invalidated = 0;
> 	}
> }

This has infinite recursion in it - you call bdev_disk_changed() from
bdev_disk_changed().

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21  8:37 [PATCH 0/2] bdev: Refresh bdev size for disks without partitioning Jan Kara
2019-10-21  8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] bdev: Factor out bdev revalidation into a common helper Jan Kara
2019-10-22  7:58   ` Damien Le Moal
2019-10-22  9:15     ` Jan Kara
2019-10-22  9:31       ` Damien Le Moal
2019-10-21  8:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] bdev: Refresh bdev size for disks without partitioning Jan Kara
2019-10-21  8:49   ` Guoqing Jiang
2019-10-21  9:12     ` Jan Kara
2019-10-21  9:27       ` Guoqing Jiang
2019-10-21  9:36         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-21  9:38           ` Guoqing Jiang
2019-10-21  9:40         ` Jan Kara [this message]
2019-10-21  9:43           ` Guoqing Jiang
2019-11-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Jens Axboe
2019-11-04  8:08   ` Jan Kara
2019-11-04 23:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-05  8:59       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021094016.GD17810@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).