From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 191/205] blok, bfq: do not plug I/O if all queues are weight-raised Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:37:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20191108113752.12502-191-sashal@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191108113752.12502-1-sashal@kernel.org> From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> [ Upstream commit c8765de0adfcaaf4ffb2d951e07444f00ffa9453 ] To reduce latency for interactive and soft real-time applications, bfq privileges the bfq_queues containing the I/O of these applications. These privileged queues, referred-to as weight-raised queues, get a much higher share of the device throughput w.r.t. non-privileged queues. To preserve this higher share, the I/O of any non-weight-raised queue must be plugged whenever a sync weight-raised queue, while being served, remains temporarily empty. To attain this goal, bfq simply plugs any I/O (from any queue), if a sync weight-raised queue remains empty while in service. Unfortunately, this plugging typically lowers throughput with random I/O, on devices with internal queueing (because it reduces the filling level of the internal queues of the device). This commit addresses this issue by restricting the cases where plugging is performed: if a sync weight-raised queue remains empty while in service, then I/O plugging is performed only if some of the active bfq_queues are *not* weight-raised (which is actually the only circumstance where plugging is needed to preserve the higher share of the throughput of weight-raised queues). This restriction proved able to boost throughput in really many use cases needing only maximum throughput. Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 35ddaa820737c..66b1ebc21ce4f 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3593,7 +3593,12 @@ static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) * whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because * bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also * weight-raised queues (see comments on - * bfq_weights_tree_add()). + * bfq_weights_tree_add()). In particular, if bfqq is being + * weight-raised, it is important to idle only if there are + * other, non-weight-raised queues that may steal throughput + * to bfqq. Actually, we should be even more precise, and + * differentiate between interactive weight raising and + * soft real-time weight raising. * * As a side note, it is worth considering that the above * device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the @@ -3605,7 +3610,8 @@ static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) * to let requests be served in the desired order until all * the requests already queued in the device have been served. */ - asymmetric_scenario = bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 || + asymmetric_scenario = (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 && + bfqd->wr_busy_queues < bfqd->busy_queues) || !bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd); /* -- 2.20.1
prev parent reply index Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <20191108113752.12502-1-sashal@kernel.org> 2019-11-08 11:37 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 190/205] block, bfq: inject other-queue I/O into seeky idle queues on NCQ flash Sasha Levin 2019-11-08 11:37 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191108113752.12502-191-sashal@kernel.org \ --to=sashal@kernel.org \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \ linux-block@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-block Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git