linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix splitting segments
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:11:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107181145.GA22076@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107152339.GA23622@ming.t460p>

On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:23:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 04:47:08AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 10:32:30AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > There are two issues in get_max_segment_size():
> > > 
> > > 1) the default segment boudary mask is bypassed, and some devices still
> > > require segment to not cross the default 4G boundary
> > > 
> > > 2) the segment start address isn't taken into account when checking
> > > segment boundary limit
> > > 
> > > Fixes the two issues.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: dcebd755926b ("block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > 
> > This patch, pushed into mainline as "block: fix splitting segments on
> > boundary masks", results in the following crash when booting 'versatilepb'
> > in qemu from disk. Bisect log is attached. Detailed log is at
> > https://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-arm-master/builds/1410/steps/qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio
> > 
> > Guenter
> > 
> > ---
> > Crash:
> > 
> > kernel BUG at block/bio.c:1885!
> > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] ARM
> 
> Please apply the following debug patch, and post the log.
> 

Here you are:

max_sectors 2560 max_segs 96 max_seg_size 65536 mask ffffffff
c738da80: 8c80/0 2416 28672, 0
         total sectors 56

(I replaced %p with %px).

Guenter

> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 347782a24a35..c4aa683a1c20 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,33 @@ static bool bvec_split_segs(const struct request_queue *q,
>  	return len > 0 || bv->bv_len > max_len;
>  }
>  
> +static void blk_dump_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
> +		unsigned secs)
> +{
> +	struct bvec_iter iter;
> +	struct bio_vec bvec;
> +	int i = 0;
> +	unsigned sectors = 0;
> +
> +	printk("max_sectors %u max_segs %u max_seg_size %u mask %lx\n",
> +			get_max_io_size(q, bio), queue_max_segments(q),
> +			queue_max_segment_size(q), queue_segment_boundary(q));
> +	printk("%p: %hx/%hx %llu %u, %u\n",
> +                       bio,
> +                       bio->bi_flags, bio->bi_opf,
> +                       (unsigned long long)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> +                       bio->bi_iter.bi_size, secs);
> +	bio_for_each_bvec(bvec, bio, iter) {
> +		sectors += bvec.bv_len >> 9;
> +		trace_printk("\t %d: %lu %u %u(%u)\n", i++,
> +				(unsigned long)page_to_pfn(bvec.bv_page),
> +				bvec.bv_offset,
> +				bvec.bv_len, bvec.bv_len >> 12);
> +	}
> +	printk("\t total sectors %u\n", sectors);
> +}
> +
> +
>  /**
>   * blk_bio_segment_split - split a bio in two bios
>   * @q:    [in] request queue pointer
> @@ -273,6 +300,9 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  	return NULL;
>  split:
>  	*segs = nsegs;
> +
> +	if (sectors <= 0 || sectors >= bio_sectors(bio))
> +		blk_dump_bio(q, bio, sectors);
>  	return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
>  }
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-07 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-29  2:32 [PATCH] block: fix splitting segments Ming Lei
2019-12-29 16:14 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-30  1:15   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-12-30  1:25     ` Ming Lei
2020-01-07 12:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-07 15:23   ` Ming Lei
2020-01-07 18:11     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2020-01-07 22:30       ` Ming Lei
2020-01-07 22:32         ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-08  1:59           ` Ming Lei
2020-01-08  2:36             ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-07 23:06         ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-08 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09  2:03   ` Ming Lei
2020-01-09  7:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09 15:18       ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-10  2:58         ` Ming Lei
2020-01-10  3:00           ` Ming Lei
2020-01-10  5:10             ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-10  6:37               ` Ming Lei
2020-01-10  7:15                 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-10 12:48                   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-10 12:36                 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-11 12:57                   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200107181145.GA22076@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).