linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	npiggin@suse.de, Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@huawei.com>,
	Guiyao <guiyao@huawei.com>, zhangsaisai <zhangsaisai@huawei.com>,
	"wubo (T)" <wubo40@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brd: check parameter validation before register_blkdev func
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 19:04:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200113110003.GA13011@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <342ee238-0e7c-c213-eecc-7062f24985cc@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 01:10:20PM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
> 
> In brd_init func, rd_nr num of brd_device are firstly allocated
> and add in brd_devices, then brd_devices are traversed to add each
> brd_device by calling add_disk func. When allocating brd_device,
> the disk->first_minor is set to i * max_part, if rd_nr * max_part
> is larger than MINORMASK, two different brd_device may have the same
> devt, then only one of them can be successfully added.
> when rmmod brd.ko, it will cause oops when calling brd_exit.
> 
> Follow those steps:
>   # modprobe brd rd_nr=3 rd_size=102400 max_part=1048576
>   # rmmod brd
> then, the oops will appear.
> 
> Oops log:
> [  726.613722] Call trace:
> [  726.614175]  kernfs_find_ns+0x24/0x130
> [  726.614852]  kernfs_find_and_get_ns+0x44/0x68
> [  726.615749]  sysfs_remove_group+0x38/0xb0
> [  726.616520]  blk_trace_remove_sysfs+0x1c/0x28
> [  726.617320]  blk_unregister_queue+0x98/0x100
> [  726.618105]  del_gendisk+0x144/0x2b8
> [  726.618759]  brd_exit+0x68/0x560 [brd]
> [  726.619501]  __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x19c/0x2a0
> [  726.620384]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
> [  726.621057]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
> [  726.621738]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> [  726.622259] Code: aa0203f6 aa0103f7 aa1e03e0 d503201f (7940e260)
> 
> Here, we add brd_check_par_valid func to check parameter
> validation before register_blkdev func.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/brd.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
> index df8103dd40ac..3a4510b2c24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/brd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
> @@ -330,16 +330,16 @@ static const struct block_device_operations brd_fops = {
>  /*
>   * And now the modules code and kernel interface.
>   */
> -static int rd_nr = CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_COUNT;
> -module_param(rd_nr, int, 0444);
> +static unsigned int rd_nr = CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_COUNT;
> +module_param(rd_nr, uint, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_nr, "Maximum number of brd devices");
> 
>  unsigned long rd_size = CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE;
>  module_param(rd_size, ulong, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(rd_size, "Size of each RAM disk in kbytes.");
> 
> -static int max_part = 1;
> -module_param(max_part, int, 0444);
> +static unsigned int max_part = 1;
> +module_param(max_part, uint, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_part, "Num Minors to reserve between devices");
> 
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> @@ -468,10 +468,25 @@ static struct kobject *brd_probe(dev_t dev, int *part, void *data)
>  	return kobj;
>  }
> 
> +static inline int brd_check_par_valid(void)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(!rd_nr))
> +		rd_nr = 1;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!max_part))
> +		max_part = 1;
> +
> +	if (rd_nr * max_part > MINORMASK)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +}
> +
>  static int __init brd_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct brd_device *brd, *next;
> -	int i;
> +	int i, ret;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * brd module now has a feature to instantiate underlying device
> @@ -488,11 +503,15 @@ static int __init brd_init(void)
>  	 *	dynamically.
>  	 */
> 
> +	ret = brd_check_par_valid();
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_info("brd: invalid parameter setting!!!\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +

The max supported partition number is 256, see __alloc_disk_node().
So even though one bigger number is passed to alloc_disk(), at most
256 partitions are allowed on that disk. Maybe you can apply the
following way to avoid the issue:

	disk->first_minor       = i * disk->minors;

However, looks 'rd_nr' still needs to be validated(rd_nr < 2 ^ 23).

Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-13 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-10  5:10 [PATCH] brd: check parameter validation before register_blkdev func Zhiqiang Liu
2020-01-13  9:55 ` Zhiqiang Liu
2020-01-13 11:04 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-01-13 12:55   ` Zhiqiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200113110003.GA13011@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=guiyao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingfangsen@huawei.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=wubo40@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangsaisai@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).