linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 045/174] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:40:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116174251.24326-45-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116174251.24326-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 1a67356e9a4829da2935dd338630a550c59c8489 ]

It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments
there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio,
because this bio may be splitted or advanced.

So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't
cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is figured
out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since
bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting").

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Fixes: 76d8137a3113 ("blk-merge: recaculate segment if it isn't less than max segments")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 7225511cf0b4..b8f1eaeeaac2 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -296,13 +296,7 @@ void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
 
 void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 {
-	unsigned short seg_cnt;
-
-	/* estimate segment number by bi_vcnt for non-cloned bio */
-	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED))
-		seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
-	else
-		seg_cnt = bio->bi_vcnt;
+	unsigned short seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
 
 	if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE, &q->queue_flags) &&
 			(seg_cnt < queue_max_segments(q)))
-- 
2.20.1


       reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200116174251.24326-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-01-16 17:40 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-01-16 17:42 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 123/174] signal: Allow cifs and drbd to receive their terminating signals Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200116174251.24326-45-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).