linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	bvanassche@acm.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdi: fix use-after-free for bdi device
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:48:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213034818.GE88887@mtj.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd9d78b9-1119-27cc-fa74-04cb85d4f578@huawei.com>

Hello,

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:46:34AM +0800, Yufen Yu wrote:
> For each time of register, bdi_register() will try to create a new 'dev'.
> 
> bdi_register
>     bdi_register_va
>         if (bdi->dev) // if bdi->dev is not NULL, return directly
>             return 0;
>         dev = device_create_vargs()...
> 
> So, I think freeing bdi->dev until bdi itself does may be a problem
> for drivers that supported re-registration bdi, such as:

Ugh, thanks for noticing that. I guess the right thing to do is then
going full RCU. What do you think about expanding your previous patch
so that ->dev has __rcu annotation, users use the RCU accessors and
the device is destroyed asynchronously through call_rcu()?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-13  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-11 14:00 [PATCH] bdi: fix use-after-free for bdi device Yufen Yu
2020-02-11 13:57 ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-12 21:33   ` Tejun Heo
2020-02-13  2:46     ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-13  3:48       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2020-02-13  7:51         ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-13 13:58           ` Tejun Heo
2020-02-14  2:50             ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-14 14:05               ` Tejun Heo
2020-02-15 13:54                 ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-19 12:55                   ` Jan Kara
2020-02-19 15:12                     ` Tejun Heo
2020-02-20 11:07                     ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-20 12:07                       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200213034818.GE88887@mtj.thefacebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).