Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 448/459] brd: check and limit max_part par
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:01:38 -0500
Message-ID: <20200214160149.11681-448-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214160149.11681-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit c8ab422553c81a0eb070329c63725df1cd1425bc ]

In brd_init func, rd_nr num of brd_device are firstly allocated
and add in brd_devices, then brd_devices are traversed to add each
brd_device by calling add_disk func. When allocating brd_device,
the disk->first_minor is set to i * max_part, if rd_nr * max_part
is larger than MINORMASK, two different brd_device may have the same
devt, then only one of them can be successfully added.
when rmmod brd.ko, it will cause oops when calling brd_exit.

Follow those steps:
  # modprobe brd rd_nr=3 rd_size=102400 max_part=1048576
  # rmmod brd
then, the oops will appear.

Oops log:
[  726.613722] Call trace:
[  726.614175]  kernfs_find_ns+0x24/0x130
[  726.614852]  kernfs_find_and_get_ns+0x44/0x68
[  726.615749]  sysfs_remove_group+0x38/0xb0
[  726.616520]  blk_trace_remove_sysfs+0x1c/0x28
[  726.617320]  blk_unregister_queue+0x98/0x100
[  726.618105]  del_gendisk+0x144/0x2b8
[  726.618759]  brd_exit+0x68/0x560 [brd]
[  726.619501]  __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x19c/0x2a0
[  726.620384]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  726.621057]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  726.621738]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[  726.622259] Code: aa0203f6 aa0103f7 aa1e03e0 d503201f (7940e260)

Here, we add brd_check_and_reset_par func to check and limit max_part par.

--
V5->V6:
 - remove useless code

V4->V5:(suggested by Ming Lei)
 - make sure max_part is not larger than DISK_MAX_PARTS

V3->V4:(suggested by Ming Lei)
 - remove useless change
 - add one limit of max_part

V2->V3: (suggested by Ming Lei)
 - clear .minors when running out of consecutive minor space in brd_alloc
 - remove limit of rd_nr

V1->V2:
 - add more checks in brd_check_par_valid as suggested by Ming Lei.

Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/block/brd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
index c548a5a6c1a00..79f18cfa7049f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/brd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
@@ -470,6 +470,25 @@ static struct kobject *brd_probe(dev_t dev, int *part, void *data)
 	return kobj;
 }
 
+static inline void brd_check_and_reset_par(void)
+{
+	if (unlikely(!max_part))
+		max_part = 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * make sure 'max_part' can be divided exactly by (1U << MINORBITS),
+	 * otherwise, it is possiable to get same dev_t when adding partitions.
+	 */
+	if ((1U << MINORBITS) % max_part != 0)
+		max_part = 1UL << fls(max_part);
+
+	if (max_part > DISK_MAX_PARTS) {
+		pr_info("brd: max_part can't be larger than %d, reset max_part = %d.\n",
+			DISK_MAX_PARTS, DISK_MAX_PARTS);
+		max_part = DISK_MAX_PARTS;
+	}
+}
+
 static int __init brd_init(void)
 {
 	struct brd_device *brd, *next;
@@ -493,8 +512,7 @@ static int __init brd_init(void)
 	if (register_blkdev(RAMDISK_MAJOR, "ramdisk"))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	if (unlikely(!max_part))
-		max_part = 1;
+	brd_check_and_reset_par();
 
 	for (i = 0; i < rd_nr; i++) {
 		brd = brd_alloc(i);
-- 
2.20.1


      parent reply index

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200214160149.11681-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-02-14 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 105/459] nbd: add a flush_workqueue in nbd_start_device Sasha Levin
2020-02-14 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 108/459] drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: fix error return codes not being returned in writeback_store Sasha Levin
2020-02-14 15:55 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 109/459] block, bfq: do not plug I/O for bfq_queues with no proc refs Sasha Levin
2020-02-14 16:01 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 420/459] rbd: work around -Wuninitialized warning Sasha Levin
2020-02-14 16:01 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200214160149.11681-448-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \
		linux-block@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-block

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git