Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: insert passthrough request into hctx->dispatch directly
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:21:40 +0800
Message-ID: <20200215032140.4093-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)

For some reason, device may be in one situation which can't handle
FS request, so STS_RESOURCE is always returned and the FS request
will be added to hctx->dispatch. However passthrough request may
be required at that time for fixing the problem. If passthrough
request is added to scheduler queue, there isn't any chance for
blk-mq to dispatch it given we prioritize requests in hctx->dispatch.
Then the FS IO request may never be completed, and IO hang is caused.

So passthrough request has to be added to hctx->dispatch directly.

Fix this issue by inserting passthrough request into hctx->dispatch
directly. Then it becomes consistent with original legacy IO request
path, in which passthrough request is always added to q->queue_head.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-flush.c    |  2 +-
 block/blk-mq-sched.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 block/blk-mq.c       | 16 ++++++++++------
 block/blk-mq.h       |  3 ++-
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 3f977c517960..5cc775bdb06a 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
 	 */
 	if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
 	    !(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
-		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false);
+		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, false);
 		return;
 	}
 
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index ca22afd47b3d..856356b1619e 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -361,13 +361,19 @@ static bool blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 				       bool has_sched,
 				       struct request *rq)
 {
-	/* dispatch flush rq directly */
-	if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ) {
-		spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-		list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
-		spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
+	/*
+	 * dispatch flush and passthrough rq directly
+	 *
+	 * passthrough request has to be added to hctx->dispatch directly.
+	 * For some reason, device may be in one situation which can't
+	 * handle FS request, so STS_RESOURCE is always returned and the
+	 * FS request will be added to hctx->dispatch. However passthrough
+	 * request may be required at that time for fixing the problem. If
+	 * passthrough request is added to scheduler queue, there isn't any
+	 * chance to dispatch it given we prioritize requests in hctx->dispatch.
+	 */
+	if ((rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ) || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq))
 		return true;
-	}
 
 	if (has_sched)
 		rq->rq_flags |= RQF_SORTED;
@@ -391,8 +397,10 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
 
 	WARN_ON(e && (rq->tag != -1));
 
-	if (blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(hctx, !!e, rq))
+	if (blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(hctx, !!e, rq)) {
+		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, at_head, false);
 		goto run;
+	}
 
 	if (e && e->type->ops.insert_requests) {
 		LIST_HEAD(list);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a12b1763508d..5f5c43ae3792 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static void blk_mq_requeue_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		 * merge.
 		 */
 		if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_DONTPREP)
-			blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false);
+			blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, false);
 		else
 			blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, true, false, false);
 	}
@@ -1677,12 +1677,16 @@ void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
  * Should only be used carefully, when the caller knows we want to
  * bypass a potential IO scheduler on the target device.
  */
-void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool run_queue)
+void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
+				  bool run_queue)
 {
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
 
 	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
+	if (at_head)
+		list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
+	else
+		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
 	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 
 	if (run_queue)
@@ -1849,7 +1853,7 @@ static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	if (bypass_insert)
 		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 
-	blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, run_queue);
+	blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, run_queue);
 	return BLK_STS_OK;
 }
 
@@ -1876,7 +1880,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 
 	ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false, true);
 	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
-		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, true);
+		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, true);
 	else if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
 		blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
 
@@ -1910,7 +1914,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
 			if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
 					ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
-				blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq,
+				blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false,
 							list_empty(list));
 				break;
 			}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index eaaca8fc1c28..c0fa34378eb2 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
  */
 void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 				bool at_head);
-void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool run_queue);
+void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
+				  bool run_queue);
 void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
 				struct list_head *list);
 
-- 
2.20.1


             reply index

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-15  3:21 Ming Lei [this message]
2020-02-19 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-19 22:10   ` Ming Lei
2020-02-19 23:47     ` dongli.zhang
2020-02-20  1:45       ` Ming Lei
2020-02-20  3:11         ` Dongli Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200215032140.4093-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \
		linux-block@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-block

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git