linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] block: fix use-after-free on cached last_lookup partition
Date: Thu,  7 May 2020 16:52:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507085239.1354854-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507085239.1354854-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

delete_partition() clears the cached last_lookup partition. However the
.last_lookup cache may be overwritten by one IO path after it is cleared
from delete_partition(). Then another IO path may use the cached deleting
partition after hd_struct_free() is called, then use-after-free is triggered
on the cached partition.

Fixes the issue by the following approach:

1) always get the partition's refcount via hd_struct_try_get() before
setting .last_lookup

2) move clearing .last_lookup from delete_partition() to hd_struct_free()
which is the release handle of the partition's percpu-refcount, so that no
IO path can overwrite .last_lookup after it is cleared in hd_struct_free().

It is one candidate approach of Yufen's patch[1] which adds overhead
in fast path by indirect lookup which may introduce one extra cacheline
in IO path. Also this patch relies on percpu-refcount's protection, and
it is easier to understand and verify.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200109013551.GB9655@ming.t460p/T/#t

Reported-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c        | 12 ------------
 block/genhd.c           |  6 +++++-
 block/partitions/core.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 include/linux/genhd.h   |  1 +
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index ec50d7e6be21..826a8980997d 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1363,18 +1363,6 @@ void blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq, bool new_io)
 		part_stat_inc(part, merges[rw]);
 	} else {
 		part = disk_map_sector_rcu(rq->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(rq));
-		if (!hd_struct_try_get(part)) {
-			/*
-			 * The partition is already being removed,
-			 * the request will be accounted on the disk only
-			 *
-			 * We take a reference on disk->part0 although that
-			 * partition will never be deleted, so we can treat
-			 * it as any other partition.
-			 */
-			part = &rq->rq_disk->part0;
-			hd_struct_get(part);
-		}
 		part_inc_in_flight(rq->q, part, rw);
 		rq->part = part;
 	}
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index c05d509877fa..8b33f0e54356 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -359,17 +359,21 @@ struct hd_struct *disk_map_sector_rcu(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
 	ptbl = rcu_dereference(disk->part_tbl);
 
 	part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->last_lookup);
-	if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector))
+	if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector) && hd_struct_try_get(part))
 		return part;
 
 	for (i = 1; i < ptbl->len; i++) {
 		part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[i]);
 
 		if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector)) {
+			if (!hd_struct_try_get(part))
+				goto exit;
 			rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, part);
 			return part;
 		}
 	}
+ exit:
+	hd_struct_get(&disk->part0);
 	return &disk->part0;
 }
 
diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
index c085bf85509b..b6cbc9b98426 100644
--- a/block/partitions/core.c
+++ b/block/partitions/core.c
@@ -288,6 +288,11 @@ static void hd_struct_free_work(struct work_struct *work)
 static void hd_struct_free(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 {
 	struct hd_struct *part = container_of(ref, struct hd_struct, ref);
+	struct disk_part_tbl *ptbl =
+		rcu_dereference_protected(part->disk->part_tbl, 1);
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
+	put_device(disk_to_dev(part->disk));
 
 	INIT_RCU_WORK(&part->rcu_work, hd_struct_free_work);
 	queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &part->rcu_work);
@@ -309,8 +314,12 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, struct hd_struct *part)
 	struct disk_part_tbl *ptbl =
 		rcu_dereference_protected(disk->part_tbl, 1);
 
+	/*
+	 * make sure disk won't be gone because ->part_tbl is referenced in
+	 * this part's release handler
+	 */
+	get_device(disk_to_dev(disk));
 	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[part->partno], NULL);
-	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
 	kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
 	device_del(part_to_dev(part));
 
@@ -393,6 +402,7 @@ static struct hd_struct *add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno,
 	p->nr_sects = len;
 	p->partno = partno;
 	p->policy = get_disk_ro(disk);
+	p->disk = disk;
 
 	if (info) {
 		struct partition_meta_info *pinfo;
diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
index f9c226f9546a..c28d1d9bfa72 100644
--- a/include/linux/genhd.h
+++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct hd_struct {
 	struct disk_stats dkstats;
 #endif
 	struct percpu_ref ref;
+	struct gendisk *disk;
 	struct rcu_work rcu_work;
 };
 
-- 
2.25.2


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07  8:52 [PATCH 0/4] block: fix partition use-after-free and optimization Ming Lei
2020-05-07  8:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-05-07 14:16   ` [PATCH 1/4] block: fix use-after-free on cached last_lookup partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08  1:54     ` Ming Lei
2020-05-07  8:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: only define 'nr_sects_seq' in hd_part for 32bit SMP Ming Lei
2020-05-07 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-07  8:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: re-organize fields of 'struct hd_part' Ming Lei
2020-05-07 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-07  8:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: don't hold part0's refcount in IO path Ming Lei
2020-05-07 14:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08  1:59     ` Ming Lei
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-09  6:21 [PATCH 0/4] block: fix partition use-after-free and optimization Ming Lei
2020-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: fix use-after-free on cached last_lookup partition Ming Lei
2020-02-21  3:05   ` Yufen Yu
2020-02-21  4:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-21  7:47     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200507085239.1354854-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).