linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: narayan@google.com, zezeozue@google.com, maco@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/11] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:38:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513133845.244903-6-maco@android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513133845.244903-1-maco@android.com>

figure_loop_size() calculates the loop size based on the passed in
parameters, but at the same time it updates the offset and sizelimit
parameters in the loop device configuration. That is a somewhat
unexpected side effect of a function with this name, and it is only only
needed by one of the two callers of this function - loop_set_status().

Move the lo_offset and lo_sizelimit assignment back into loop_set_status(),
and use the newly factored out functions to validate and apply the newly
calculated size. This allows us to get rid of figure_loop_size() in a
follow-up commit.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index d9a756f8abd5..c134b3439483 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit)
 {
 	loff_t size = get_size(offset, sizelimit, lo->lo_backing_file);
 
-	if (lo->lo_offset != offset)
-		lo->lo_offset = offset;
-	if (lo->lo_sizelimit != sizelimit)
-		lo->lo_sizelimit = sizelimit;
-
 	loop_set_size(lo, size);
 }
 
@@ -1272,6 +1267,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
 	kuid_t uid = current_uid();
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 	bool partscan = false;
+	bool size_changed = false;
 
 	err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (err)
@@ -1293,6 +1289,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
 
 	if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
 	    lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
+		size_changed = true;
 		sync_blockdev(lo->lo_device);
 		kill_bdev(lo->lo_device);
 	}
@@ -1300,6 +1297,15 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
 	/* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
 	blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
+	if (size_changed && lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
+		/* If any pages were dirtied after kill_bdev(), try again */
+		err = -EAGAIN;
+		pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
+			__func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
+			lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
+		goto out_unfreeze;
+	}
+
 	err = loop_release_xfer(lo);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_unfreeze;
@@ -1323,19 +1329,8 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
 	if (err)
 		goto out_unfreeze;
 
-	if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
-	    lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
-		/* kill_bdev should have truncated all the pages */
-		if (lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
-			err = -EAGAIN;
-			pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
-				__func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
-				lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
-			goto out_unfreeze;
-		}
-		figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit);
-	}
-
+	lo->lo_offset = info->lo_offset;
+	lo->lo_sizelimit = info->lo_sizelimit;
 	memcpy(lo->lo_file_name, info->lo_file_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
 	memcpy(lo->lo_crypt_name, info->lo_crypt_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
 	lo->lo_file_name[LO_NAME_SIZE-1] = 0;
@@ -1359,6 +1354,12 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
 		lo->lo_key_owner = uid;
 	}
 
+	if (size_changed) {
+		loff_t new_size = get_size(lo->lo_offset, lo->lo_sizelimit,
+					   lo->lo_backing_file);
+		loop_set_size(lo, new_size);
+	}
+
 	loop_config_discard(lo);
 
 	/* update dio if lo_offset or transfer is changed */
-- 
2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-13 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 13:38 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add a new LOOP_CONFIGURE ioctl Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] loop: Call loop_config_discard() only after new config is applied Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] loop: Remove sector_t truncation checks Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] loop: Factor out setting loop device size Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] loop: Switch to set_capacity_revalidate_and_notify() Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` Martijn Coenen [this message]
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] loop: Remove figure_loop_size() Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] loop: Factor out configuring loop from status Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] loop: Move loop_set_status_from_info() and friends up Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] loop: Rework lo_ioctl() __user argument casting Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] loop: Clean up LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] loop: Add LOOP_CONFIGURE ioctl Martijn Coenen
2021-06-11 22:54   ` Kristian Klausen
2020-05-21 14:21 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Add a new " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200513133845.244903-6-maco@android.com \
    --to=maco@android.com \
    --cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maco@google.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=narayan@google.com \
    --cc=zezeozue@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).