From: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: narayan@google.com, zezeozue@google.com, maco@google.com,
kernel-team@android.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/11] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:38:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513133845.244903-6-maco@android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513133845.244903-1-maco@android.com>
figure_loop_size() calculates the loop size based on the passed in
parameters, but at the same time it updates the offset and sizelimit
parameters in the loop device configuration. That is a somewhat
unexpected side effect of a function with this name, and it is only only
needed by one of the two callers of this function - loop_set_status().
Move the lo_offset and lo_sizelimit assignment back into loop_set_status(),
and use the newly factored out functions to validate and apply the newly
calculated size. This allows us to get rid of figure_loop_size() in a
follow-up commit.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index d9a756f8abd5..c134b3439483 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit)
{
loff_t size = get_size(offset, sizelimit, lo->lo_backing_file);
- if (lo->lo_offset != offset)
- lo->lo_offset = offset;
- if (lo->lo_sizelimit != sizelimit)
- lo->lo_sizelimit = sizelimit;
-
loop_set_size(lo, size);
}
@@ -1272,6 +1267,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
kuid_t uid = current_uid();
struct block_device *bdev;
bool partscan = false;
+ bool size_changed = false;
err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
if (err)
@@ -1293,6 +1289,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
+ size_changed = true;
sync_blockdev(lo->lo_device);
kill_bdev(lo->lo_device);
}
@@ -1300,6 +1297,15 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
/* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
+ if (size_changed && lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
+ /* If any pages were dirtied after kill_bdev(), try again */
+ err = -EAGAIN;
+ pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
+ __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
+ lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
+ goto out_unfreeze;
+ }
+
err = loop_release_xfer(lo);
if (err)
goto out_unfreeze;
@@ -1323,19 +1329,8 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
if (err)
goto out_unfreeze;
- if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
- lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
- /* kill_bdev should have truncated all the pages */
- if (lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
- err = -EAGAIN;
- pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
- __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
- lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
- goto out_unfreeze;
- }
- figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit);
- }
-
+ lo->lo_offset = info->lo_offset;
+ lo->lo_sizelimit = info->lo_sizelimit;
memcpy(lo->lo_file_name, info->lo_file_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
memcpy(lo->lo_crypt_name, info->lo_crypt_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
lo->lo_file_name[LO_NAME_SIZE-1] = 0;
@@ -1359,6 +1354,12 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
lo->lo_key_owner = uid;
}
+ if (size_changed) {
+ loff_t new_size = get_size(lo->lo_offset, lo->lo_sizelimit,
+ lo->lo_backing_file);
+ loop_set_size(lo, new_size);
+ }
+
loop_config_discard(lo);
/* update dio if lo_offset or transfer is changed */
--
2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 13:38 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add a new LOOP_CONFIGURE ioctl Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] loop: Call loop_config_discard() only after new config is applied Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] loop: Remove sector_t truncation checks Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] loop: Factor out setting loop device size Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] loop: Switch to set_capacity_revalidate_and_notify() Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` Martijn Coenen [this message]
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] loop: Remove figure_loop_size() Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] loop: Factor out configuring loop from status Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] loop: Move loop_set_status_from_info() and friends up Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] loop: Rework lo_ioctl() __user argument casting Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] loop: Clean up LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling Martijn Coenen
2020-05-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] loop: Add LOOP_CONFIGURE ioctl Martijn Coenen
2021-06-11 22:54 ` Kristian Klausen
2020-05-21 14:21 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Add a new " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200513133845.244903-6-maco@android.com \
--to=maco@android.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@google.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=narayan@google.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).