From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] blk-mq: support batching dispatch from scheduler
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 10:17:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525021714.GA791214@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADBw62o9eTQDJ9RvNgEqSpXmg6Xcq=2TxH0Hfxhp29uF2W=TXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 03:45:55PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:55 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > More and more drivers want to get batching requests queued from
> > block layer, such as mmc[1], and tcp based storage drivers[2]. Also
> > current in-tree users have virtio-scsi, virtio-blk and nvme.
> >
> > For none, we already support batching dispatch.
> >
> > But for io scheduler, every time we just take one request from scheduler
> > and pass the single request to blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(). This way makes
> > batching dispatch not possible when io scheduler is applied. One reason
> > is that we don't want to hurt sequential IO performance, becasue IO
> > merge chance is reduced if more requests are dequeued from scheduler
> > queue.
> >
> > Tries to start the support by dequeuing more requests from scheduler
> > if budget is enough and device isn't busy.
> >
> > Simple fio test over virtio-scsi shows IO can get improved by 5~10%.
> >
> > Patches can be found from the following tree too:
> >
> > https://github.com/ming1/linux/commits/v5.7-rc-blk-mq-batching-submission
> >
> > Patch 1 ~ 7 are improvement and cleanup, which can't applied without
> > supporting batching dispatch.
> >
> > Patch 8 ~ 9 starts to support batching dispatch from scheduler.
>
> Sorry for late reply. I've tested your patch set and got some better
> performance. Thanks.
> Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Hi Baolin,
Thanks for your test & feedback, then looks this approach is good.
I will address comments on v1 and post v2 soon.
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 9:54 [PATCH 0/9] blk-mq: support batching dispatch from scheduler Ming Lei
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: pass request queue into get/put budget callback Ming Lei
2020-05-13 10:06 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-05-13 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 14:36 ` Doug Anderson
2020-05-13 22:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] blk-mq: pass hctx to blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list Ming Lei
2020-05-13 12:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 22:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] blk-mq: don't predicate last flag in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list Ming Lei
2020-05-13 12:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 0:50 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-14 5:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 2:09 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-14 2:19 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-14 3:21 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-14 8:28 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] blk-mq: move getting driver tag and bugget into one helper Ming Lei
2020-05-13 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 22:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] blk-mq: move .queue_rq code " Ming Lei
2020-05-13 12:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-mq: move code for handling partial dispatch " Ming Lei
2020-05-13 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 1:25 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-mq: remove dead check from blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list Ming Lei
2020-05-13 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 23:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-mq: pass obtained budget count to blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list Ming Lei
2020-05-13 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 9:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-mq: support batching dispatch in case of io scheduler Ming Lei
2020-05-23 7:45 ` [PATCH 0/9] blk-mq: support batching dispatch from scheduler Baolin Wang
2020-05-25 2:17 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200525021714.GA791214@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).