Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:28:41 +0200
Message-ID: <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603144949.1122421-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
> 
>    [PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
> 
> are now pending on the lockdep/x86 IRQ state tracking patch series:
> 
>    [PATCH 00/14] x86/entry: disallow #DB more and x86/entry lockdep/nmi
>    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529212728.795169701@infradead.org
> 
>    [PATCH v3 0/5] lockdep: Change IRQ state tracking to use per-cpu variables
>    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529213550.683440625@infradead.org
> 
> This is a repost only of the seqcount_t call sites bugfixes that were on
> top of the seqlock patch series.
> 
> These fixes are independent, and can thus be merged on their own. I'm
> reposting them now so they can at least hit -rc2 or -rc3.

I'm confused on what I should do with patch 6 here for dma-buf. Looks like
just a good cleanup/prep work, so I'd queue it for linux-next and 5.9, but
sounds like you want this in earlier. Do you need this in 5.8-rc for some
work meant for 5.9? Will this go in through some topic branch directly?
Should I apply it?

Patch itself lgtm, I'm just confused what I should do with it.
-Daniel

> 
> Changelog-v2:
> 
>   - patch #1: Add a missing up_read() on netdev_get_name() error path
>               exit. Thanks to Dan/kbuild-bot report.
> 
>   - patch #4: new patch, invalid preemptible context found by the new
>               lockdep checks added in the seqlock series + kbuild-bot.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 8<--------------
> 
> Ahmed S. Darwish (6):
>   net: core: device_rename: Use rwsem instead of a seqcount
>   net: phy: fixed_phy: Remove unused seqcount
>   u64_stats: Document writer non-preemptibility requirement
>   net: mdiobus: Disable preemption upon u64_stats update
>   block: nr_sects_write(): Disable preemption on seqcount write
>   dma-buf: Remove custom seqcount lockdep class key
> 
>  block/blk.h                    |  2 ++
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c     |  9 +------
>  drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c    | 26 ++++++++------------
>  drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c     |  2 ++
>  include/linux/dma-resv.h       |  2 --
>  include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  net/core/dev.c                 | 40 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>  7 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> 
> base-commit: 3d77e6a8804abcc0504c904bd6e5cdf3a5cf8162
> --
> 2.20.1

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03 14:49 Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] block: nr_sects_write(): Disable preemption on seqcount write Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-05  3:22   ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-04  7:28 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-06-04  8:41   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-04 22:50 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \
		linux-block@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-block

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git