linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 6/6] blktrace: break out of blktrace setup on concurrent calls
       [not found] <20200623173658.1356241-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2020-06-23 17:36 ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-06-23 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Luis Chamberlain, Jan Kara, Bart Van Assche, Christoph Hellwig,
	Jens Axboe, Sasha Levin, linux-block

From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 1b0b283648163dae2a214ca28ed5a99f62a77319 ]

We use one blktrace per request_queue, that means one per the entire
disk.  So we cannot run one blktrace on say /dev/vda and then /dev/vda1,
or just two calls on /dev/vda.

We check for concurrent setup only at the very end of the blktrace setup though.

If we try to run two concurrent blktraces on the same block device the
second one will fail, and the first one seems to go on. However when
one tries to kill the first one one will see things like this:

The kernel will show these:

```
debugfs: File 'dropped' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present!
debugfs: File 'msg' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present!
debugfs: File 'trace0' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present!
``

And userspace just sees this error message for the second call:

```
blktrace /dev/nvme1n1
BLKTRACESETUP(2) /dev/nvme1n1 failed: 5/Input/output error
```

The first userspace process #1 will also claim that the files
were taken underneath their nose as well. The files are taken
away form the first process given that when the second blktrace
fails, it will follow up with a BLKTRACESTOP and BLKTRACETEARDOWN.
This means that even if go-happy process #1 is waiting for blktrace
data, we *have* been asked to take teardown the blktrace.

This can easily be reproduced with break-blktrace [0] run_0005.sh test.

Just break out early if we know we're already going to fail, this will
prevent trying to create the files all over again, which we know still
exist.

[0] https://github.com/mcgrof/break-blktrace

Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 6d3b432a748a6..88eb9261c7b5c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
  *
  */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/blktrace_api.h>
@@ -481,6 +484,16 @@ int do_blk_trace_setup(struct request_queue *q, char *name, dev_t dev,
 	 */
 	strreplace(buts->name, '/', '_');
 
+	/*
+	 * bdev can be NULL, as with scsi-generic, this is a helpful as
+	 * we can be.
+	 */
+	if (q->blk_trace) {
+		pr_warn("Concurrent blktraces are not allowed on %s\n",
+			buts->name);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
 	bt = kzalloc(sizeof(*bt), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!bt)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-06-23 17:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20200623173658.1356241-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-06-23 17:36 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 6/6] blktrace: break out of blktrace setup on concurrent calls Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).