From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH V6 2/6] blk-mq: pass hctx to blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:03:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624230349.1046821-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624230349.1046821-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
All requests in the 'list' of blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list belong to same
hctx, so it is better to pass hctx instead of request queue, because
blk-mq's dispatch target is hctx instead of request queue.
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 14 ++++++--------
block/blk-mq.c | 6 +++---
block/blk-mq.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index a31e281e9d31..632c6f8b63f7 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -96,10 +96,9 @@ static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
int ret = 0;
+ struct request *rq;
do {
- struct request *rq;
-
if (e->type->ops.has_work && !e->type->ops.has_work(hctx))
break;
@@ -131,7 +130,7 @@ static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
* in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list().
*/
list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list);
- } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+ } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(rq->mq_hctx, &rq_list, true));
return ret;
}
@@ -161,10 +160,9 @@ static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = READ_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from);
int ret = 0;
+ struct request *rq;
do {
- struct request *rq;
-
if (!list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch)) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
break;
@@ -200,7 +198,7 @@ static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
/* round robin for fair dispatch */
ctx = blk_mq_next_ctx(hctx, rq->mq_ctx);
- } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+ } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(rq->mq_hctx, &rq_list, true));
WRITE_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from, ctx);
return ret;
@@ -240,7 +238,7 @@ static int __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
- if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false)) {
+ if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(hctx, &rq_list, false)) {
if (has_sched_dispatch)
ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
else
@@ -253,7 +251,7 @@ static int __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
} else {
blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
- blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+ blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(hctx, &rq_list, false);
}
return ret;
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9eea9c19bca2..481bd8973c93 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1260,10 +1260,10 @@ static void blk_mq_handle_zone_resource(struct request *rq,
/*
* Returns true if we did some work AND can potentially do more.
*/
-bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
+bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list,
bool got_budget)
{
- struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
+ struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
struct request *rq, *nxt;
bool no_tag = false;
int errors, queued;
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
- hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(hctx != rq->mq_hctx);
if (!got_budget && !blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(q)) {
blk_mq_put_driver_tag(rq);
no_budget_avail = true;
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index 4408f09d7bff..5f292ad19a29 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct blk_mq_ctx {
void blk_mq_exit_queue(struct request_queue *q);
int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr);
void blk_mq_wake_waiters(struct request_queue *q);
-bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *, struct list_head *, bool);
+bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *, bool);
void blk_mq_add_to_requeue_list(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
bool kick_requeue_list);
void blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list);
--
2.25.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 23:03 [PATCH V6 0/6] blk-mq: support batching dispatch from scheduler Ming Lei
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [PATCH V6 1/6] blk-mq: pass request queue into get/put budget callback Ming Lei
2020-06-24 23:03 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [PATCH V6 3/6] blk-mq: move getting driver tag and budget into one helper Ming Lei
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [PATCH V6 4/6] blk-mq: remove dead check from blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list Ming Lei
2020-06-25 7:42 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [PATCH V6 5/6] blk-mq: pass obtained budget count to blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list Ming Lei
2020-06-29 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [PATCH V6 6/6] blk-mq: support batching dispatch in case of io scheduler Ming Lei
2020-06-29 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-29 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-30 0:57 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-30 4:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-30 4:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624230349.1046821-3-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).