linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Javier González" <javier@javigon.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>,
	Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
	Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] block: add support for selecting all zones
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 07:58:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626055852.ec6bfvx7mj3ucz5r@mpHalley.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR04MB375143652B4BA25F1680A91EE7930@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 26.06.2020 01:27, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>On 2020/06/25 21:22, Javier González wrote:
>> From: Javier González <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
>>
>> Add flag to allow selecting all zones on a single zone management
>> operation
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier González <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-zoned.c             | 3 +++
>>  include/linux/blk_types.h     | 3 ++-
>>  include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h | 9 +++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-zoned.c b/block/blk-zoned.c
>> index e87c60004dc5..29194388a1bb 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-zoned.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-zoned.c
>> @@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ int blkdev_zone_mgmt_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>>  		return -ENOTTY;
>>  	}
>>
>> +	if (zmgmt.flags & BLK_ZONE_SELECT_ALL)
>> +		op |= REQ_ZONE_ALL;
>> +
>>  	return blkdev_zone_mgmt(bdev, op, zmgmt.sector, zmgmt.nr_sectors,
>>  				GFP_KERNEL);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
>> index ccb895f911b1..16b57fb2b99c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
>> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits {
>>  	 * work item to avoid such priority inversions.
>>  	 */
>>  	__REQ_CGROUP_PUNT,
>> +	__REQ_ZONE_ALL,		/* apply zone operation to all zones */
>>
>>  	/* command specific flags for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES: */
>>  	__REQ_NOUNMAP,		/* do not free blocks when zeroing */
>> @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits {
>>  #define REQ_BACKGROUND		(1ULL << __REQ_BACKGROUND)
>>  #define REQ_NOWAIT		(1ULL << __REQ_NOWAIT)
>>  #define REQ_CGROUP_PUNT		(1ULL << __REQ_CGROUP_PUNT)
>> -
>> +#define REQ_ZONE_ALL		(1ULL << __REQ_ZONE_ALL)
>>  #define REQ_NOUNMAP		(1ULL << __REQ_NOUNMAP)
>>  #define REQ_HIPRI		(1ULL << __REQ_HIPRI)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h b/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h
>> index 07b5fde21d9f..a8c89fe58f97 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/blkzoned.h
>> @@ -157,6 +157,15 @@ enum blk_zone_action {
>>  	BLK_ZONE_MGMT_RESET	= 0x4,
>>  };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * enum blk_zone_mgmt_flags - Flags for blk_zone_mgmt
>> + *
>> + * BLK_ZONE_SELECT_ALL: Select all zones for current zone action
>> + */
>> +enum blk_zone_mgmt_flags {
>> +	BLK_ZONE_SELECT_ALL	= 1 << 0,
>> +};
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * struct blk_zone_mgmt - Extended zoned management
>>   *
>>
>
>NACK.
>
>Details:
>1) REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET together with REQ_ZONE_ALL is the same as
>REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL, isn't it ? You are duplicating a functionality that
>already exists.
>2) The patch introduces REQ_ZONE_ALL at the block layer only without defining
>how it ties into SCSI and NVMe driver use of it. Is REQ_ZONE_ALL indicating that
>the zone management commands are to be executed with the ALL bit set ? If yes,
>that will break device-mapper. See the special code for handling
>REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL. That code is in place for a reason: the target block
>device may not be an entire physical device. In that case, applying a zone
>management command to all zones of the physical drive is wrong.
>3) REQ_ZONE_ALL seems completely equivalent to specifying a sector range of [0
>.. drive capacity]. So what is the point ? The current interface handles that.
>That is how we chose between REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET and REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL right now.
>4) Without any in-kernel user, I do not see the point. And for applications, I
>do not see any good use case for doing open all, close all, offline all or
>finish all. If you have any such good use case, please elaborate.
>

The main use if reset all, but without having to look through all zones,
as it imposes an overhead when we have a large number of zones. Having
the possibility to offload it to HW is more efficient.

I had not thought about the device mapper use case. Would it be an
option to translate this into REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL when we have a
device mapper (or any other case where this might break) and then leave
the bit go to the driver if it applies to the whole device?

Javier

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-25 12:21 [PATCH 0/6] ZNS: Extra features for current patches Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: introduce IOCTL for zone mgmt Javier González
2020-06-26  1:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:01     ` Javier González
2020-06-26  6:37       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:51         ` Javier González
2020-06-26  7:03           ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  7:08             ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: add support for selecting all zones Javier González
2020-06-26  1:27   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  5:58     ` Javier González [this message]
2020-06-26  6:35       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:52         ` Javier González
2020-06-26  7:06           ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: add support for zone offline transition Javier González
2020-06-25 14:12   ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:48     ` Javier González
2020-06-26  1:14       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:18         ` Javier González
2020-06-26  9:11         ` hch
2020-06-26  9:15           ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  9:17             ` hch
2020-06-26 10:02               ` Javier González
2020-06-26  9:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  1:34   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:08     ` Javier González
2020-06-26  6:42       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:58         ` Javier González
2020-06-26  7:17           ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  7:26             ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: introduce IOCTL to report dev properties Javier González
2020-06-25 13:10   ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:42     ` Javier González
2020-06-25 19:58       ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-26  6:24         ` Javier González
2020-06-25 20:25       ` Keith Busch
2020-06-26  6:28         ` Javier González
2020-06-26 15:52           ` Keith Busch
2020-06-26 16:25             ` Javier González
2020-06-26  0:57       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:27         ` Javier González
2020-06-26  1:38   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:22     ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: add zone attr. to zone mgmt IOCTL struct Javier González
2020-06-25 15:13   ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:51     ` Javier González
2020-06-26  1:45   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:03     ` Javier González
2020-06-26  6:38       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:49         ` Javier González
2020-06-26  9:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 10:01     ` Javier González
2020-06-25 12:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: Add consistency check for zone count Javier González
2020-06-25 13:16   ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:45     ` Javier González
2020-06-25 21:49   ` Keith Busch
2020-06-26  0:04     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:13       ` Javier González
2020-06-26  6:49         ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  6:55           ` Javier González
2020-06-26  7:09             ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  7:29               ` Javier González
2020-06-26  7:42                 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-26  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 10:03     ` Javier González
2020-06-25 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] ZNS: Extra features for current patches Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 14:48   ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-25 19:39     ` Javier González
2020-06-25 19:53       ` Matias Bjørling
2020-06-26  6:26         ` Javier González

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200626055852.ec6bfvx7mj3ucz5r@mpHalley.localdomain \
    --to=javier@javigon.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=selvakuma.s1@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).