From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BC9C433DF for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2827520720 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726019AbgF3FNe (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:13:34 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34513 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725845AbgF3FNe (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:13:34 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2FB886736F; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:13:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Chaitanya Kulkarni Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, jack@suse.czi, rdunlap@infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, snitzer@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, paolo.valente@linaro.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, bvanassche@acm.org, fangguoju@gmail.com, colyli@suse.de, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] block: use block_bio class for getrq and sleeprq Message-ID: <20200630051332.GG27033@lst.de> References: <20200629234314.10509-1-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> <20200629234314.10509-11-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200629234314.10509-11-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:43:13PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > The only difference in block_get_rq and block_bio was the last param > passed __entry->nr_sector & bio->bi_iter.bi_size respectively. Since > that is not the case anymore replace block_get_rq class with block_bio > for block_getrq and block_sleeprq events, also adjust the code to handle > null bio case in block_bio. To me it seems like keeping the NULL bio case separate actually is a little simpler..