Hi all,

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:21:24 -0400 Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 09:56:25AM -0400, Guo Xuenan wrote:
> > It is no need do finish_wait twice after acquiring inflight.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-rq-qos.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
> > index 656460636ad3..18f3eab9f768 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
> > @@ -273,8 +273,6 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data,
> >  		if (data.got_token)
> >  			break;
> >  		if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
> > -			finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
> > -
> >  			/*
> >  			 * We raced with wbt_wake_function() getting a token,
> >  			 * which means we now have two. Put our local token
> > -- 
> > 2.25.4  
> 
> Reverting this commit fixed an issue that swapping workloads will stall for
> days without being able to make any progress below.

I have reverted that commit from linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell