From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A41C433E2 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8D120717 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:52:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595440370; bh=vrnmZaIRwliX53vKBQ1d28+Q7Z0/op5TGz4Tmb8WGq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=B4/l+Vmqc1EmbVQ3S/xxqhWRk74Bt3SRMR3ADvhJYBKGX1KyNah/5luzBo8Lc0Pnl PUr6OzuR+VRVXcshUjQT8FJYAA71wu+eZIAwxxQWoBKp656qgsJbspJ6uOf8yFuK72 t+uWvjmNSzORnCIsXFeRzCI2lqHMKxb3z2fB7WVY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726717AbgGVRwt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:52:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47944 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726390AbgGVRwt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:52:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (mobile-166-175-191-139.mycingular.net [166.175.191.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98897207E8; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:52:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595440368; bh=vrnmZaIRwliX53vKBQ1d28+Q7Z0/op5TGz4Tmb8WGq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=MT5KD0YChPzECugkAoboefewuQBRltWzpOPiPz+eGS/ldE9SkVjtBIHXxJ6AsKZy+ eaelqTIBaEU9qQYYGbVy7BnKaL6SxxdeQmEE7XfPqIjxBKlkI3qJ0o1zfePMA19NI2 fe2lG/NpdREikmYTJMHGU6ovyy3KqjDZ521FeDM0= Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:52:47 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Vaibhav Gupta Cc: Damien Le Moal , Bjorn Helgaas , Bjorn Helgaas , Vaibhav Gupta , Jens Axboe , Joshua Morris , Philip Kelleher , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] skd: use generic power management Message-ID: <20200722175247.GA1293794@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200721070939.GB51743@gmail.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:39:39PM +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Okay. I will improve on it. Just inform me after testing that if any other > changes are required. I guess [PATCH 1/3] and [PATCH 2/3] are okay, so I will > only send v3 of [PATCH 3/3] after suggested changes. FWIW, there's a recent conversation on users@linux.kernel.org about updating individual patches in a series (sorry, can't find a link to it). But the gist of it was that posting only [v3 3/3] leads to confusion because - we can't tell whether [v3 1/3] and [v3 2/3] got lost en-route, and - collecting things from v2 and v3 is more work for the maintainer. Bottom line: repost the whole series, even if some patches haven't changed. Bjorn