From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>, Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> Subject: [PATCH v4 7/9] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:46:13 -0800 Message-ID: <20201130024615.29171-8-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201130024615.29171-1-bvanassche@acm.org> Instead of submitting all SCSI commands submitted with scsi_execute() to a SCSI device if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE, only submit RQF_PM (power management requests) if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE. This patch makes the SCSI core handle the runtime power management status (rpm_status) as it should be handled. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> --- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c index b7ac14571415..91bc39a4c3c3 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c @@ -249,7 +249,8 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd, req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue, data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ? - REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT); + REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, + rq_flags & RQF_PM ? BLK_MQ_REQ_PM : 0); if (IS_ERR(req)) return ret; rq = scsi_req(req); @@ -1206,6 +1207,8 @@ static blk_status_t scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req) { switch (sdev->sdev_state) { + case SDEV_CREATED: + return BLK_STS_OK; case SDEV_OFFLINE: case SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE: /* @@ -1232,18 +1235,18 @@ scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req) return BLK_STS_RESOURCE; case SDEV_QUIESCE: /* - * If the devices is blocked we defer normal commands. + * If the device is blocked we only accept power management + * commands. */ - if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT)) + if (req && WARN_ON_ONCE(!(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM))) return BLK_STS_RESOURCE; return BLK_STS_OK; default: /* * For any other not fully online state we only allow - * special commands. In particular any user initiated - * command is not allowed. + * power management commands. */ - if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT)) + if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM)) return BLK_STS_IOERR; return BLK_STS_OK; } @@ -2517,15 +2520,13 @@ void sdev_evt_send_simple(struct scsi_device *sdev, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdev_evt_send_simple); /** - * scsi_device_quiesce - Block user issued commands. + * scsi_device_quiesce - Block all commands except power management. * @sdev: scsi device to quiesce. * * This works by trying to transition to the SDEV_QUIESCE state * (which must be a legal transition). When the device is in this - * state, only special requests will be accepted, all others will - * be deferred. Since special requests may also be requeued requests, - * a successful return doesn't guarantee the device will be - * totally quiescent. + * state, only power management requests will be accepted, all others will + * be deferred. * * Must be called with user context, may sleep. * @@ -2587,12 +2588,12 @@ void scsi_device_resume(struct scsi_device *sdev) * device deleted during suspend) */ mutex_lock(&sdev->state_mutex); + if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE) + scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING); if (sdev->quiesced_by) { sdev->quiesced_by = NULL; blk_clear_pm_only(sdev->request_queue); } - if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE) - scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING); mutex_unlock(&sdev->state_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_resume);
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-30 2:46 [PATCH v4 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche 2020-12-01 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-12-02 6:50 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche 2020-12-01 11:29 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-12-02 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche 2020-12-01 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-12-02 6:53 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] scsi: Do not wait for a request in scsi_eh_lock_door() Bart Van Assche 2020-12-02 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-12-03 5:10 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-12-03 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-12-03 7:27 ` Ming Lei 2020-12-04 16:50 ` Bart Van Assche 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche 2020-12-01 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-11-30 2:46 ` Bart Van Assche [this message] 2020-12-01 11:32 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Christoph Hellwig 2020-12-02 7:14 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche 2020-12-01 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-12-02 7:15 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-11-30 2:46 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche 2020-12-02 7:16 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-12-02 1:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen 2020-12-06 0:01 ` Jens Axboe 2020-12-08 1:56 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201130024615.29171-8-bvanassche@acm.org \ --to=bvanassche@acm.org \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \ --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \ --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \ --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \ linux-block@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-block Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git