From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:20:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208132004.GC22219@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201204191356.2516405-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 3467 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:13:56PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> With llist_head it is possible to avoid the locking (the irq-off region)
> when items are added. This makes it possible to add items on a remote
> CPU.
> llist_add() returns true if the list was previously empty. This can be
> used to invoke the SMP function call / raise sofirq only if the first
> item was added (otherwise it is already pending).
> This simplifies the code a little and reduces the IRQ-off regions. With
> this change it possible to reduce the SMP-function call a simple
> __raise_softirq_irqoff().
> blk_mq_complete_request_remote() needs a preempt-disable section if the
> request needs to complete on the local CPU. Some callers (USB-storage)
> invoke this preemptible context and the request needs to be enqueued on
> the same CPU as the softirq is raised.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 77 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 3c0e94913d874..b5138327952a4 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
> #include "blk-mq-sched.h"
> #include "blk-rq-qos.h"
>
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, blk_cpu_done);
>
> static void blk_mq_poll_stats_start(struct request_queue *q);
> static void blk_mq_poll_stats_fn(struct blk_stat_callback *cb);
> @@ -567,68 +567,32 @@ void blk_mq_end_request(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_end_request);
>
> +static void blk_complete_reqs(struct llist_head *cpu_list)
> {
> + struct llist_node *entry;
> + struct request *rq, *rq_next;
>
> + entry = llist_del_all(cpu_list);
> + entry = llist_reverse_order(entry);
I find the variable naming and split of the assignments a little
strange. What about:
static void blk_complete_reqs(struct llist_head *list)
{
struct llist_node *first = llist_reverse_order(llist_del_all(list));
struct request *rq, *next;
?
> + llist_for_each_entry_safe(rq, rq_next, entry, ipi_list)
> rq->q->mq_ops->complete(rq);
> }
Aren't some sanitizers going to be unhappy if we never delete the
request from the list?
> bool blk_mq_complete_request_remote(struct request *rq)
> {
> + struct llist_head *cpu_list;
> WRITE_ONCE(rq->state, MQ_RQ_COMPLETE);
>
> /*
> @@ -669,12 +634,22 @@ bool blk_mq_complete_request_remote(struct request *rq)
> return false;
>
> if (blk_mq_complete_need_ipi(rq)) {
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +
> + cpu = rq->mq_ctx->cpu;
> + cpu_list = &per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, cpu);
> + if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, cpu_list)) {
> + INIT_CSD(&rq->csd, __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, rq);
> + smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);
> + }
I think the above code section inside the conditional should go into a
little helper instead of being open coded here in the fast path routine.
I laso don't really see the ¶oint of the cpu and cpulist locl variables.
> } else {
> if (rq->q->nr_hw_queues > 1)
> return false;
> + preempt_disable();
> + cpu_list = this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_done);
> + if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, cpu_list))
> + raise_softirq(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ);
> + preempt_enable();
I think the section after the return false here also would benefit from
a little helper with a descriptive name.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-04 19:13 [PATCH 0/3 v2] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-04 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Don't complete on a remote CPU in force threaded mode Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-04 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-07 23:52 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 8:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 8:44 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 11:36 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 11:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 12:41 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 12:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 12:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 13:27 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 16:45 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 16:49 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 16:54 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-17 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-17 16:55 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 16:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-17 17:05 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 18:16 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 18:41 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 19:07 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 19:13 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 19:15 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-04 19:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-14 20:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-23 20:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 6:56 [PATCH RFC] blk-mq: Don't IPI requests on PREEMPT_RT Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Don't complete on a remote CPU in force threaded mode Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-28 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-28 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 14:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-29 13:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-29 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-29 14:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-29 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-29 20:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-29 21:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-29 21:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-31 10:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-31 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-31 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-31 18:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-02 9:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-11-02 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 19:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-06 15:23 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201208132004.GC22219@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).