From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Tim Waugh <tim@cyberelk.net>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove ->revalidate_disk (resend)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:28:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330052837.GA4726@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465891ab-0633-2ee3-b51a-fe2e7be5f9ca@kernel.dk>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 07:01:54AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/28/21 11:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:45:47AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> Hi Jens,
> >>
> >> with the previously merged patches all real users of ->revalidate_disk
> >> are gone. This series removes the two remaining not actually required
> >> instances and the method itself.
> >
> > Jens,
> >
> > can you consider this for the 5.13 tree?
>
> Looks fine to me, we just need to drop the umem change as it was
> removed. And paride really should be as well... But in any case,
Last time asked around (for the blk-mq conversion) we still had people
actively using it.
> I'll queue up the other two or 5.13.
So this ended up on the drivers branch. I do have a buch of core
changes pending that will depend on it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 7:45 remove ->revalidate_disk (resend) Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-08 7:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] paride/pd: remove ->revalidate_disk Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-08 7:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] umem: " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-08 7:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: remove the revalidate_disk method Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-29 5:55 ` remove ->revalidate_disk (resend) Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-29 13:01 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-30 5:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-16 9:41 ` chenxiang (M)
2021-06-16 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 3:43 ` chenxiang (M)
2021-06-17 10:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 11:50 ` chenxiang (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210330052837.GA4726@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim@cyberelk.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).