linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	slp@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] virtio_blk: avoid repeating vblk->vqs[qid]
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:13:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520141305.355961-3-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520141305.355961-1-stefanha@redhat.com>

struct virtio_blk_vq is accessed in many places. Introduce "vbq" local
variables to avoid repeating vblk->vqs[qid] throughout the code. The
patches that follow will add more accesses, making the payoff even
greater.

virtio_commit_rqs() calls the local variable "vq", which is easily
confused with struct virtqueue. Rename to "vbq" for clarity.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index b9fa3ef5b57c..fc0fb1dcd399 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -174,16 +174,16 @@ static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
 static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
 {
 	struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv;
+	struct virtio_blk_vq *vbq = &vblk->vqs[vq->index];
 	bool req_done = false;
-	int qid = vq->index;
 	struct virtblk_req *vbr;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int len;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&vbq->lock, flags);
 	do {
 		virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
-		while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, &len)) != NULL) {
+		while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)) != NULL) {
 			struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(vbr);
 
 			if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q)))
@@ -197,32 +197,32 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
 	/* In case queue is stopped waiting for more buffers. */
 	if (req_done)
 		blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(vblk->disk->queue, true);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vbq->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void virtio_commit_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
-	struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
+	struct virtio_blk_vq *vbq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
 	bool kick;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&vq->lock);
-	kick = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq->vq);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&vq->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&vbq->lock);
+	kick = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vbq->vq);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&vbq->lock);
 
 	if (kick)
-		virtqueue_notify(vq->vq);
+		virtqueue_notify(vbq->vq);
 }
 
 static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 			   const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
 {
 	struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
+	struct virtio_blk_vq *vbq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
 	struct request *req = bd->rq;
 	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int num;
-	int qid = hctx->queue_num;
 	int err;
 	bool notify = false;
 	bool unmap = false;
@@ -274,16 +274,16 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 			vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
-	err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&vbq->lock, flags);
+	err = virtblk_add_req(vbq->vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num);
 	if (err) {
-		virtqueue_kick(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
+		virtqueue_kick(vbq->vq);
 		/* Don't stop the queue if -ENOMEM: we may have failed to
 		 * bounce the buffer due to global resource outage.
 		 */
 		if (err == -ENOSPC)
 			blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vbq->lock, flags);
 		switch (err) {
 		case -ENOSPC:
 			return BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
@@ -294,12 +294,12 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (bd->last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vqs[qid].vq))
+	if (bd->last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vbq->vq))
 		notify = true;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vbq->lock, flags);
 
 	if (notify)
-		virtqueue_notify(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
+		virtqueue_notify(vbq->vq);
 	return BLK_STS_OK;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 14:13 [PATCH 0/3] virtio_blk: blk-mq io_poll support Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-20 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio: add virtioqueue_more_used() Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-25  2:23   ` Jason Wang
2021-05-25  8:48     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-20 14:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2021-05-25  2:25   ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio_blk: avoid repeating vblk->vqs[qid] Jason Wang
2021-05-20 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio_blk: implement blk_mq_ops->poll() Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-24 14:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-25  7:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-25  7:38       ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25  8:06         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-25 13:20         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-25 13:19     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Jason Wang
2021-05-25  8:59     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-27  5:48       ` Jason Wang
2021-06-03 15:24         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-27  2:44   ` Ming Lei
2021-06-03 15:12     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-03 15:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] virtio_blk: blk-mq io_poll support Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-16  7:43   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210520141305.355961-3-stefanha@redhat.com \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).