linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] block/mq-deadline: Improve compile-time argument checking
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2021 16:06:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608230703.19510-10-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608230703.19510-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

Modern compilers complain if an out-of-range value is passed to a function
argument that has an enumeration type. Let the compiler detect out-of-range
data direction arguments instead of verifying the data_dir argument at
runtime.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 block/mq-deadline.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index d823ba7cb084..69126beff77d 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -35,6 +35,13 @@ static const int writes_starved = 2;    /* max times reads can starve a write */
 static const int fifo_batch = 16;       /* # of sequential requests treated as one
 				     by the above parameters. For throughput. */
 
+enum dd_data_dir {
+	DD_READ		= READ,
+	DD_WRITE	= WRITE,
+};
+
+enum { DD_DIR_COUNT = 2 };
+
 struct deadline_data {
 	/*
 	 * run time data
@@ -43,20 +50,20 @@ struct deadline_data {
 	/*
 	 * requests (deadline_rq s) are present on both sort_list and fifo_list
 	 */
-	struct rb_root sort_list[2];
-	struct list_head fifo_list[2];
+	struct rb_root sort_list[DD_DIR_COUNT];
+	struct list_head fifo_list[DD_DIR_COUNT];
 
 	/*
 	 * next in sort order. read, write or both are NULL
 	 */
-	struct request *next_rq[2];
+	struct request *next_rq[DD_DIR_COUNT];
 	unsigned int batching;		/* number of sequential requests made */
 	unsigned int starved;		/* times reads have starved writes */
 
 	/*
 	 * settings that change how the i/o scheduler behaves
 	 */
-	int fifo_expire[2];
+	int fifo_expire[DD_DIR_COUNT];
 	int fifo_batch;
 	int writes_starved;
 	int front_merges;
@@ -97,7 +104,7 @@ deadline_add_rq_rb(struct deadline_data *dd, struct request *rq)
 static inline void
 deadline_del_rq_rb(struct deadline_data *dd, struct request *rq)
 {
-	const int data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
+	const enum dd_data_dir data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
 
 	if (dd->next_rq[data_dir] == rq)
 		dd->next_rq[data_dir] = deadline_latter_request(rq);
@@ -169,10 +176,10 @@ static void dd_merged_requests(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 static void
 deadline_move_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct request *rq)
 {
-	const int data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
+	const enum dd_data_dir data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
 
-	dd->next_rq[READ] = NULL;
-	dd->next_rq[WRITE] = NULL;
+	dd->next_rq[DD_READ] = NULL;
+	dd->next_rq[DD_WRITE] = NULL;
 	dd->next_rq[data_dir] = deadline_latter_request(rq);
 
 	/*
@@ -185,9 +192,10 @@ deadline_move_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct request *rq)
  * deadline_check_fifo returns 0 if there are no expired requests on the fifo,
  * 1 otherwise. Requires !list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[data_dir])
  */
-static inline int deadline_check_fifo(struct deadline_data *dd, int ddir)
+static inline int deadline_check_fifo(struct deadline_data *dd,
+				      enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
 {
-	struct request *rq = rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[ddir].next);
+	struct request *rq = rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
 
 	/*
 	 * rq is expired!
@@ -203,19 +211,16 @@ static inline int deadline_check_fifo(struct deadline_data *dd, int ddir)
  * dispatch using arrival ordered lists.
  */
 static struct request *
-deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
+deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
 {
 	struct request *rq;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data_dir != READ && data_dir != WRITE))
-		return NULL;
-
 	if (list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[data_dir]))
 		return NULL;
 
 	rq = rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
-	if (data_dir == READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -223,7 +228,7 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
 	 * an unlocked target zone.
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(rq, &dd->fifo_list[WRITE], queuelist) {
+	list_for_each_entry(rq, &dd->fifo_list[DD_WRITE], queuelist) {
 		if (blk_req_can_dispatch_to_zone(rq))
 			goto out;
 	}
@@ -239,19 +244,16 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
  * dispatch using sector position sorted lists.
  */
 static struct request *
-deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
+deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, enum dd_data_dir data_dir)
 {
 	struct request *rq;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data_dir != READ && data_dir != WRITE))
-		return NULL;
-
 	rq = dd->next_rq[data_dir];
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (data_dir == READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
 static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd)
 {
 	struct request *rq, *next_rq;
-	int data_dir;
+	enum dd_data_dir data_dir;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&dd->lock);
 
@@ -289,9 +291,9 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd)
 	/*
 	 * batches are currently reads XOR writes
 	 */
-	rq = deadline_next_request(dd, WRITE);
+	rq = deadline_next_request(dd, DD_WRITE);
 	if (!rq)
-		rq = deadline_next_request(dd, READ);
+		rq = deadline_next_request(dd, DD_READ);
 
 	if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch)
 		/* we have a next request are still entitled to batch */
@@ -302,14 +304,14 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd)
 	 * data direction (read / write)
 	 */
 
-	if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[READ])) {
-		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dd->sort_list[READ]));
+	if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[DD_READ])) {
+		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dd->sort_list[DD_READ]));
 
-		if (deadline_fifo_request(dd, WRITE) &&
+		if (deadline_fifo_request(dd, DD_WRITE) &&
 		    (dd->starved++ >= dd->writes_starved))
 			goto dispatch_writes;
 
-		data_dir = READ;
+		data_dir = DD_READ;
 
 		goto dispatch_find_request;
 	}
@@ -318,13 +320,13 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd)
 	 * there are either no reads or writes have been starved
 	 */
 
-	if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE])) {
+	if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[DD_WRITE])) {
 dispatch_writes:
-		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dd->sort_list[WRITE]));
+		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dd->sort_list[DD_WRITE]));
 
 		dd->starved = 0;
 
-		data_dir = WRITE;
+		data_dir = DD_WRITE;
 
 		goto dispatch_find_request;
 	}
@@ -399,8 +401,8 @@ static void dd_exit_sched(struct elevator_queue *e)
 {
 	struct deadline_data *dd = e->elevator_data;
 
-	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[READ]));
-	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE]));
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[DD_READ]));
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[DD_WRITE]));
 
 	kfree(dd);
 }
@@ -424,12 +426,12 @@ static int dd_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
 	}
 	eq->elevator_data = dd;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->fifo_list[READ]);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE]);
-	dd->sort_list[READ] = RB_ROOT;
-	dd->sort_list[WRITE] = RB_ROOT;
-	dd->fifo_expire[READ] = read_expire;
-	dd->fifo_expire[WRITE] = write_expire;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->fifo_list[DD_READ]);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->fifo_list[DD_WRITE]);
+	dd->sort_list[DD_READ] = RB_ROOT;
+	dd->sort_list[DD_WRITE] = RB_ROOT;
+	dd->fifo_expire[DD_READ] = read_expire;
+	dd->fifo_expire[DD_WRITE] = write_expire;
 	dd->writes_starved = writes_starved;
 	dd->front_merges = 1;
 	dd->fifo_batch = fifo_batch;
@@ -497,7 +499,7 @@ static void dd_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
 	struct deadline_data *dd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
-	const int data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
+	const enum dd_data_dir data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&dd->lock);
 
@@ -585,7 +587,7 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
 		blk_req_zone_write_unlock(rq);
-		if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE]))
+		if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[DD_WRITE]))
 			blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
 	}
@@ -626,8 +628,8 @@ static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, char *page)		\
 		__data = jiffies_to_msecs(__data);			\
 	return deadline_var_show(__data, (page));			\
 }
-SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_read_expire_show, dd->fifo_expire[READ], 1);
-SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_write_expire_show, dd->fifo_expire[WRITE], 1);
+SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_read_expire_show, dd->fifo_expire[DD_READ], 1);
+SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_write_expire_show, dd->fifo_expire[DD_WRITE], 1);
 SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_writes_starved_show, dd->writes_starved, 0);
 SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_front_merges_show, dd->front_merges, 0);
 SHOW_FUNCTION(deadline_fifo_batch_show, dd->fifo_batch, 0);
@@ -649,8 +651,8 @@ static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, const char *page, size_t count)
 		*(__PTR) = __data;					\
 	return count;							\
 }
-STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_read_expire_store, &dd->fifo_expire[READ], 0, INT_MAX, 1);
-STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_write_expire_store, &dd->fifo_expire[WRITE], 0, INT_MAX, 1);
+STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_read_expire_store, &dd->fifo_expire[DD_READ], 0, INT_MAX, 1);
+STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_write_expire_store, &dd->fifo_expire[DD_WRITE], 0, INT_MAX, 1);
 STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_writes_starved_store, &dd->writes_starved, INT_MIN, INT_MAX, 0);
 STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_front_merges_store, &dd->front_merges, 0, 1, 0);
 STORE_FUNCTION(deadline_fifo_batch_store, &dd->fifo_batch, 0, INT_MAX, 0);
@@ -717,8 +719,8 @@ static int deadline_##name##_next_rq_show(void *data,			\
 		__blk_mq_debugfs_rq_show(m, rq);			\
 	return 0;							\
 }
-DEADLINE_DEBUGFS_DDIR_ATTRS(READ, read)
-DEADLINE_DEBUGFS_DDIR_ATTRS(WRITE, write)
+DEADLINE_DEBUGFS_DDIR_ATTRS(DD_READ, read)
+DEADLINE_DEBUGFS_DDIR_ATTRS(DD_WRITE, write)
 #undef DEADLINE_DEBUGFS_DDIR_ATTRS
 
 static int deadline_batching_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08 23:06 [PATCH 00/14] Improve I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 01/14] block/Kconfig: Make the BLK_WBT and BLK_WBT_MQ entries consecutive Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  4:14   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-09  7:03   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-06-10  6:02   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 02/14] block/blk-cgroup: Swap the blk_throtl_init() and blk_iolatency_init() calls Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  4:19   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-09  7:05   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-06-10  6:02   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 03/14] block/blk-rq-qos: Move a function from a header file into a C file Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  4:22   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-10  6:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 04/14] block: Introduce the ioprio rq-qos policy Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  4:40   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-09 16:48     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  0:29       ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-10  6:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-10 17:14     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 05/14] block/mq-deadline: Add several comments Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 06/14] block/mq-deadline: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 07/14] block/mq-deadline: Remove two local variables Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  6:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 08/14] block/mq-deadline: Rename dd_init_queue() and dd_exit_queue() Bart Van Assche
2021-06-08 23:06 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-06-08 23:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] block/mq-deadline: Improve the sysfs show and store macros Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  4:46   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-09 16:54     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  0:31       ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-09  7:11   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-06-09 16:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  6:23   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:07 ` [PATCH 11/14] block/mq-deadline: Reserve 25% of scheduler tags for synchronous requests Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  6:26   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:07 ` [PATCH 12/14] block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  5:03   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-09 17:25     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  0:39       ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-10  6:35   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:07 ` [PATCH 13/14] block/mq-deadline: Add cgroup support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-10  6:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 23:07 ` [PATCH 14/14] block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests Bart Van Assche
2021-06-09  5:10   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-10  6:43   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210608230703.19510-10-bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 09/14] block/mq-deadline: Improve compile-time argument checking' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).