From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Wunderlich, Mark" <mark.wunderlich@intel.com>,
"Vasudevan, Anil" <anil.vasudevan@intel.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/16] blk-mq: factor out a "classic" poll helper
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:10:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615131034.752623-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615131034.752623-1-hch@lst.de>
Factor the code to do the classic full metal polling out of blk_poll into
a separate blk_mq_poll_classic helper.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Tested-by: Mark Wunderlich <mark.wunderlich@intel.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9b3fe1062061..f4bb6e1db36a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ static inline struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_qc_to_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
return q->queue_hw_ctx[(qc & ~BLK_QC_T_INTERNAL) >> BLK_QC_T_SHIFT];
}
+static inline struct request *blk_qc_to_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+ blk_qc_t qc)
+{
+ if (blk_qc_t_is_internal(qc))
+ return blk_mq_tag_to_rq(hctx->sched_tags, blk_qc_t_to_tag(qc));
+ return blk_mq_tag_to_rq(hctx->tags, blk_qc_t_to_tag(qc));
+}
+
/*
* Check if any of the ctx, dispatch list or elevator
* have pending work in this hardware queue.
@@ -3874,15 +3882,20 @@ static unsigned long blk_mq_poll_nsecs(struct request_queue *q,
return ret;
}
-static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(struct request_queue *q,
- struct request *rq)
+static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t qc)
{
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_qc_to_hctx(q, qc);
+ struct request *rq = blk_qc_to_rq(hctx, qc);
struct hrtimer_sleeper hs;
enum hrtimer_mode mode;
unsigned int nsecs;
ktime_t kt;
- if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_MQ_POLL_SLEPT)
+ /*
+ * If a request has completed on queue that uses an I/O scheduler, we
+ * won't get back a request from blk_qc_to_rq.
+ */
+ if (!rq || (rq->rq_flags & RQF_MQ_POLL_SLEPT))
return false;
/*
@@ -3924,32 +3937,48 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(struct request_queue *q,
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&hs.timer);
+
+ /*
+ * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset the
+ * state. Like for the other success return cases, the caller is
+ * responsible for checking if the IO completed. If the IO isn't
+ * complete, we'll get called again and will go straight to the busy
+ * poll loop.
+ */
return true;
}
-static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
- struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
+static int blk_mq_poll_classic(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie,
+ bool spin)
{
- struct request *rq;
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_qc_to_hctx(q, cookie);
+ long state = current->state;
+ int ret;
- if (q->poll_nsec == BLK_MQ_POLL_CLASSIC)
- return false;
+ hctx->poll_considered++;
- if (!blk_qc_t_is_internal(cookie))
- rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(hctx->tags, blk_qc_t_to_tag(cookie));
- else {
- rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(hctx->sched_tags, blk_qc_t_to_tag(cookie));
- /*
- * With scheduling, if the request has completed, we'll
- * get a NULL return here, as we clear the sched tag when
- * that happens. The request still remains valid, like always,
- * so we should be safe with just the NULL check.
- */
- if (!rq)
- return false;
- }
+ do {
+ hctx->poll_invoked++;
- return blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(q, rq);
+ ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ hctx->poll_success++;
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+ return 1;
+
+ if (ret < 0 || !spin)
+ break;
+ cpu_relax();
+ } while (!need_resched());
+
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -3966,9 +3995,6 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
*/
int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
{
- struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
- long state;
-
if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
return 0;
@@ -3976,46 +4002,12 @@ int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
if (current->plug)
blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
- hctx = blk_qc_to_hctx(q, cookie);
-
- /*
- * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
- * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
- * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
- * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
- * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
- * we also should not sleep.
- */
- if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
- return 1;
-
- hctx->poll_considered++;
-
- state = current->state;
- do {
- int ret;
-
- hctx->poll_invoked++;
-
- ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
- if (ret > 0) {
- hctx->poll_success++;
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- return ret;
- }
-
- if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-
- if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+ /* If specified not to spin, we also should not sleep. */
+ if (spin && q->poll_nsec != BLK_MQ_POLL_CLASSIC) {
+ if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
return 1;
- if (ret < 0 || !spin)
- break;
- cpu_relax();
- } while (!need_resched());
-
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- return 0;
+ }
+ return blk_mq_poll_classic(q, cookie, spin);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 13:10 switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4 Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 01/16] direct-io: remove blk_poll support Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 02/16] block: don't try to poll multi-bio I/Os in __blkdev_direct_IO Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 03/16] iomap: don't try to poll multi-bio I/Os in __iomap_dio_rw Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 04/16] blk-mq: factor out a blk_qc_to_hctx helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 06/16] blk-mq: remove blk_qc_t_to_tag and blk_qc_t_is_internal Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 07/16] blk-mq: remove blk_qc_t_valid Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 08/16] block: replace the spin argument to blk_iopoll with a flags argument Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 09/16] io_uring: don't sleep when polling for I/O Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 10/16] block: rename REQ_HIPRI to REQ_POLLED Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 11/16] block: use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for the bio slab Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 12/16] block: define 'struct bvec_iter' as packed Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 13/16] block: switch polling to be bio based Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-16 2:30 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-18 14:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-18 14:27 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-21 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 8:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 14/16] block: don't allow writing to the poll queue attribute Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 15/16] nvme-multipath: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 16/16] nvme-multipath: enable polled I/O Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 14:37 ` switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4 Keith Busch
2021-06-15 16:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210615131034.752623-6-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=anil.vasudevan@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.wunderlich@intel.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).