From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Wunderlich, Mark" <mark.wunderlich@intel.com>,
"Vasudevan, Anil" <anil.vasudevan@intel.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:06:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615160619.GA32435@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615143706.GB646237@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:37:06AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 03:10:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Chances since v3:
> > - rebased to the latests for-5.14/block tree
> > - fix the refcount logic in __blkdev_direct_IO
> > - split up a patch to make it easier to review
> > - grab a queue reference in bio_poll
> > - better document the RCU assumptions in bio_poll
>
> It still doesn't look like a failover will work when polling through
> pvsync2. We previously discussed that here:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=162100971816071&w=2
Yes, sorry for losing this. I'll resend with that added after a short
delay to see if anything else needs attention.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 13:10 switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4 Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 01/16] direct-io: remove blk_poll support Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 02/16] block: don't try to poll multi-bio I/Os in __blkdev_direct_IO Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 03/16] iomap: don't try to poll multi-bio I/Os in __iomap_dio_rw Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 04/16] blk-mq: factor out a blk_qc_to_hctx helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 05/16] blk-mq: factor out a "classic" poll helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 06/16] blk-mq: remove blk_qc_t_to_tag and blk_qc_t_is_internal Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 07/16] blk-mq: remove blk_qc_t_valid Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 08/16] block: replace the spin argument to blk_iopoll with a flags argument Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 09/16] io_uring: don't sleep when polling for I/O Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 10/16] block: rename REQ_HIPRI to REQ_POLLED Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 11/16] block: use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for the bio slab Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 12/16] block: define 'struct bvec_iter' as packed Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 13/16] block: switch polling to be bio based Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-16 2:30 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-18 14:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-18 14:27 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-21 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 8:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 14/16] block: don't allow writing to the poll queue attribute Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 15/16] nvme-multipath: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:10 ` [PATCH 16/16] nvme-multipath: enable polled I/O Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 14:37 ` switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4 Keith Busch
2021-06-15 16:06 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-10-12 11:12 Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 14:47 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 14:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 15:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210615160619.GA32435@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=anil.vasudevan@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.wunderlich@intel.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).