linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc: "Paolo Valente" <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Luca Mariotti" <mariottiluca1@hotmail.it>,
	"Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>,
	"Pietro Pedroni" <pedroni.pietro.96@gmail.com>,
	"Piotr Gorski" <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>,
	"Khazhy Kumykov" <khazhy@google.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:29:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210622162948.GJ14261@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8003699.Qy64SzLKsf@spock>

On Tue 22-06-21 09:35:05, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On úterý 22. června 2021 9:08:43 CEST Paolo Valente wrote:
> > CCing also Jan and Khazhy, because in your commit log I see also the
> > commit on bfq_requests_merged().
> > 
> > Is this OOPS reproducible for you?
> 
> No, I haven't found a reproducer, at least yet. It took half a day of uptime 
> to hit this, so might not be that easy.

Hum, if you can acquire a crash dump it would be the easiest I guess. We'd
need to find out more about the request we crash on - whether it's
otherwise valid, in what state it is etc...

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-22 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-19 14:09 [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 1/7] block, bfq: let also stably merged queues enjoy weight raising Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 2/7] block, bfq: fix delayed stable merge check Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 3/7] block, bfq: consider also creation time in delayed stable merge Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 4/7] block, bfq: boost throughput by extending queue-merging times Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 5/7] block, bfq: avoid delayed merge of async queues Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 6/7] block, bfq: check waker only for queues with no in-flight I/O Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 7/7] block, bfq: reset waker pointer with shared queues Paolo Valente
2021-06-21 16:08 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs Jens Axboe
2021-06-21 19:55 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-06-21 20:03   ` Piotr Górski
2021-06-22  7:08   ` Paolo Valente
2021-06-22  7:35     ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-06-22 16:29       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2021-06-22 17:26         ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-07-02 22:07         ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-08-02 20:40           ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-08-03 10:45             ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210622162948.GJ14261@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=mariottiluca1@hotmail.it \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=pedroni.pietro.96@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).