linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 6/6] blk-mq: don't deactivate hctx if managed irq isn't used
Date: Fri,  2 Jul 2021 23:05:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210702150555.2401722-7-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210702150555.2401722-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

No need to deactivate one hctx if managed irq isn't used because
non-managed irq can be migrated to online cpus.

So we don't need to register cpu hotplug handler for
CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE if managed irq isn't used.

Given BLK_MQ_F_MANAGED_IRQ is more generic and straightforward, it covers
!BLK_MQ_F_STACKING perfectly because managed irq is only used in
underlying controller, so remove BLK_MQ_F_STACKING.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 1 -
 block/blk-mq.c         | 4 ++--
 drivers/block/loop.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-rq.c     | 2 +-
 include/linux/blk-mq.h | 5 -----
 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
index 17f57af3a4d6..3641a16c2910 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
@@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ static const char *const hctx_flag_name[] = {
 	HCTX_FLAG_NAME(TAG_QUEUE_SHARED),
 	HCTX_FLAG_NAME(BLOCKING),
 	HCTX_FLAG_NAME(NO_SCHED),
-	HCTX_FLAG_NAME(STACKING),
 	HCTX_FLAG_NAME(TAG_HCTX_SHARED),
 	HCTX_FLAG_NAME(MANAGED_IRQ),
 };
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 1d45d2922ca7..e672ebd93342 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2636,7 +2636,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 
 static void blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
-	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_STACKING))
+	if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_MANAGED_IRQ)
 		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
 						    &hctx->cpuhp_online);
 	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD,
@@ -2731,7 +2731,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 {
 	hctx->queue_num = hctx_idx;
 
-	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_STACKING))
+	if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_MANAGED_IRQ)
 		cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
 				&hctx->cpuhp_online);
 	cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, &hctx->cpuhp_dead);
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index cc0e8c39a48b..02509bc54242 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
 	lo->tag_set.queue_depth = 128;
 	lo->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 	lo->tag_set.cmd_size = sizeof(struct loop_cmd);
-	lo->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE | BLK_MQ_F_STACKING;
+	lo->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
 	lo->tag_set.driver_data = lo;
 
 	err = blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
index 0dbd48cbdff9..294d4858c067 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int dm_mq_init_request_queue(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *t)
 	md->tag_set->ops = &dm_mq_ops;
 	md->tag_set->queue_depth = dm_get_blk_mq_queue_depth();
 	md->tag_set->numa_node = md->numa_node_id;
-	md->tag_set->flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE | BLK_MQ_F_STACKING;
+	md->tag_set->flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
 	md->tag_set->nr_hw_queues = dm_get_blk_mq_nr_hw_queues();
 	md->tag_set->driver_data = md;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 62fc0393cc3a..d75ab9fd64fc 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -397,11 +397,6 @@ struct blk_mq_ops {
 enum {
 	BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE	= 1 << 0,
 	BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED = 1 << 1,
-	/*
-	 * Set when this device requires underlying blk-mq device for
-	 * completing IO:
-	 */
-	BLK_MQ_F_STACKING	= 1 << 2,
 	BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED = 1 << 3,
 	BLK_MQ_F_MANAGED_IRQ	= 1 << 4,
 	BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING	= 1 << 5,
-- 
2.31.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-02 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-02 15:05 [PATCH V2 0/6] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Ming Lei
2021-07-02 15:05 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] blk-mq: prepare for not deactivating hctx if managed irq isn't used Ming Lei
2021-07-02 15:05 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] nvme: pci: pass BLK_MQ_F_MANAGED_IRQ to blk-mq Ming Lei
2021-07-02 15:05 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] scsi: add flag of .use_managed_irq to 'struct Scsi_Host' Ming Lei
2021-07-05  9:25   ` John Garry
2021-07-05  9:55     ` Ming Lei
2021-07-06  5:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-06  7:41         ` Ming Lei
2021-07-06 10:32           ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-07 10:53             ` Ming Lei
2021-07-02 15:05 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] scsi: set shost->use_managed_irq if driver uses managed irq Ming Lei
2021-07-05  7:35   ` John Garry
2021-07-06  5:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-02 15:05 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] virtio: add one field into virtio_device for recording if device " Ming Lei
2021-07-02 15:55   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-05  2:48     ` Ming Lei
2021-07-05  3:59   ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06  5:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-06  7:53     ` Ming Lei
2021-07-07  9:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-07  9:42       ` Ming Lei
2021-07-07 14:05         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-08  6:34           ` Ming Lei
2021-07-02 15:05 ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210702150555.2401722-7-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).