From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/7] genirq/affinity: remove the 'firstvec' parameter from irq_build_affinity_masks
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:57:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719095729.834332-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719095729.834332-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
The 'firstvec' parameter is always same with the parameter of
'startvec', so use 'startvec' directly inside irq_build_affinity_masks().
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
kernel/irq/affinity.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 735f697d7d15..0c535591f2f2 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -336,10 +336,10 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
* 2) spread other possible CPUs on these vectors
*/
static int irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec, unsigned int numvecs,
- unsigned int firstvec,
struct irq_affinity_desc *masks)
{
unsigned int curvec = startvec, nr_present = 0, nr_others = 0;
+ unsigned int firstvec = startvec;
cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask;
cpumask_var_t nmsk, npresmsk;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -469,8 +469,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(unsigned int nvecs, struct irq_affinity *affd)
unsigned int this_vecs = affd->set_size[i];
int ret;
- ret = irq_build_affinity_masks(curvec, this_vecs,
- curvec, masks);
+ ret = irq_build_affinity_masks(curvec, this_vecs, masks);
if (ret) {
kfree(masks);
return NULL;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 9:57 [RFC PATCH 0/7] genirq/affinity: abstract new API from managed irq affinity spread Ming Lei
2021-07-19 9:57 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-07-19 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] genirq/affinity: pass affinity managed mask array to irq_build_affinity_masks Ming Lei
2021-07-19 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] genirq/affinity: don't pass irq_affinity_desc " Ming Lei
2021-07-19 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] genirq/affinity: rename irq_build_affinity_masks as group_cpus_evenly Ming Lei
2021-07-19 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] genirq/affinity: move group_cpus_evenly() into lib/ Ming Lei
2021-07-19 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] lib/group_cpus: allow to group cpus in case of !CONFIG_SMP Ming Lei
2021-07-19 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: build default queue map via group_cpus_evenly() Ming Lei
2021-07-26 10:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] genirq/affinity: abstract new API from managed irq affinity spread Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210719095729.834332-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).