linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 3/3] blk-mq: don't deactivate hctx if managed irq isn't used
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:17:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210721091723.1152456-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721091723.1152456-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

blk-mq deactivates one hctx when the last CPU in hctx->cpumask become
offline by draining all requests originated from this hctx and moving new
allocation to other active hctx. This way is for avoiding inflight IO in
case of managed irq because managed irq is shutdown when the last CPU in
the irq's affinity becomes offline.

However, lots of drivers(nvme fc, rdma, tcp, loop, ...) don't use managed
irq, so they needn't to deactivate hctx when the last CPU becomes offline.
Also, some of them are the only user of blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() which
is used for connecting io queue. And their requirement is that the connect
request needs to be submitted successfully via one specified hctx even though
all CPUs in this hctx->cpumask have become offline.

Addressing the requirement for nvme fc/rdma/loop by allowing to
allocate request from one hctx when all CPUs in this hctx are offline,
since these drivers don't use managed irq.

Finally don't deactivate one hctx when it doesn't use managed irq.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
 block/blk-mq.h |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 2c4ac51e54eb..591ab07c64d8 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -427,6 +427,15 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_alloc_request);
 
+static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+	int cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+		cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+	return cpu;
+}
+
 struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 	unsigned int op, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags, unsigned int hctx_idx)
 {
@@ -468,7 +477,10 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 	data.hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[hctx_idx];
 	if (!blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(data.hctx))
 		goto out_queue_exit;
-	cpu = cpumask_first_and(data.hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(blk_mq_hctx_use_managed_irq(data.hctx));
+
+	cpu = blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(data.hctx);
 	data.ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(q, cpu);
 
 	if (!q->elevator)
@@ -1501,15 +1513,6 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
 }
 
-static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
-{
-	int cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
-
-	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-		cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
-	return cpu;
-}
-
 /*
  * It'd be great if the workqueue API had a way to pass
  * in a mask and had some smarts for more clever placement.
@@ -2556,6 +2559,10 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node,
 			struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_online);
 
+	/* hctx needn't to be deactivated in case managed irq isn't used */
+	if (!blk_mq_hctx_use_managed_irq(hctx))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask) ||
 	    !blk_mq_last_cpu_in_hctx(cpu, hctx))
 		return 0;
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index d08779f77a26..7333b659d8f5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ static inline struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_map_queue(struct request_queue *q,
 	return ctx->hctxs[type];
 }
 
+static inline bool blk_mq_hctx_use_managed_irq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+	if (hctx->type == HCTX_TYPE_POLL)
+		return false;
+
+	return hctx->queue->tag_set->map[hctx->type].use_managed_irq;
+}
+
 /*
  * sysfs helpers
  */
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21  9:17 [PATCH V5 0/3] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Ming Lei
2021-07-21  9:17 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] driver core: add device_has_managed_msi_irq Ming Lei
2021-07-21 13:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-21 14:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-21  9:17 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] blk-mq: mark if one queue map uses managed irq Ming Lei
2021-07-21 14:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-22  1:24     ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21 18:53   ` John Garry
2021-07-22  1:22     ` Ming Lei
2021-07-21  9:17 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-07-21 14:37   ` [PATCH V5 3/3] blk-mq: don't deactivate hctx if managed irq isn't used Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210721091723.1152456-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).