From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE0EC4332F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CC46121F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236495AbhIOHGH (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:06:07 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35119 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231301AbhIOHGG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:06:06 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 847D767373; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:04:45 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alexander Viro , Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] xfs: convert xfs_sysfs attrs to use ->seq_show Message-ID: <20210915070445.GA17384@lst.de> References: <20210913054121.616001-1-hch@lst.de> <20210913054121.616001-14-hch@lst.de> <20210914073003.GA31077@lst.de> <20210914153011.GA815@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:41:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > They huge majority of sysfs attributes are "trivial". So for maybe at > least 95% of the users, if not more, using sysfs_emit() is just fine as > all you "should" be doing is emitting a single value. It is just fine if no one does the obvious mistakes that an interface with a char * pointer leads to. And 5% of all attributes is still a huge attack surface.