From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Restore I/O priority support in the mq-deadline scheduler
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:23:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210923232358.3907118-1-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
Hi Jens,
This patch series includes the following changes:
- Fix request accounting by counting requeued requests once.
- Test correctness of the request accounting code by triggering a kernel
warning from inside dd_exit_sched() if an inconsistency has been detected.
- Switch from per-CPU counters to individual counters.
- Restore I/O priority support in the mq-deadline scheduler. The performance
measurements in the description of patch 4/4 show that the peformance
regressions in the previous version of this patch have been fixed. This has
been achieved by using 'jiffies' instead of ktime_get() and also by skipping
the aging mechanism if all queued requests have the same I/O priority.
Please consider this patch series for kernel v5.16.
Thanks,
Bart.
Bart Van Assche (4):
block/mq-deadline: Improve request accounting further
block/mq-deadline: Add an invariant check
block/mq-deadline: Stop using per-CPU counters
block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests
block/mq-deadline.c | 221 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-23 23:23 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-09-23 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] block/mq-deadline: Improve request accounting further Bart Van Assche
2021-09-23 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] block/mq-deadline: Add an invariant check Bart Van Assche
2021-09-24 10:54 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-27 15:53 ` Niklas Cassel
2021-09-23 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] block/mq-deadline: Stop using per-CPU counters Bart Van Assche
2021-09-24 10:58 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-25 2:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-27 0:19 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-27 2:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-27 3:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-27 15:53 ` Niklas Cassel
2021-09-23 23:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests Bart Van Assche
2021-09-24 11:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-27 20:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-24 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] block/mq-deadline: Improve request accounting further Damien Le Moal
2021-09-27 15:53 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210923232358.3907118-1-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).