From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Split and submit bios in LBA order
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:09:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230321090908.GA27216@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbf73fed-265f-b244-608c-bfcf5c1b6d4d@opensource.wdc.com>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 05:51:29PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Interesting. We have never seen such issue in practice with the device mappers
> that support zoned devices. But it seems interesting to try to find a use case
> that could trigger this. Will look into it, and if everything is fixed, it would
> still be a good regression test for blocktest.
I think it requires a non-zoneappend bio that is large enough to
require splitting and which goes through a remapper.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-21 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 19:59 [PATCH 0/2] Submit split bios in LBA order Bart Van Assche
2023-03-17 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Split blk_recalc_rq_segments() Bart Van Assche
2023-03-18 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-17 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: Split and submit bios in LBA order Bart Van Assche
2023-03-17 22:28 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-18 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-17 23:38 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-17 23:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-20 23:28 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-20 23:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-21 0:44 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-21 1:46 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-21 2:17 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-21 3:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-21 8:00 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-21 8:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-21 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-03-21 9:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-21 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-21 14:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-23 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-23 10:28 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-23 16:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-23 22:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-24 16:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-25 2:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-25 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-26 1:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-26 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-27 21:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-27 23:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-06 20:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-27 21:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-18 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-18 6:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] Submit split " Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-20 17:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-20 21:06 ` Khazhy Kumykov
2023-03-23 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 17:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-25 2:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-26 23:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-26 23:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-06 20:32 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230321090908.GA27216@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).