Re: [PATCH 00/32] pata_parport-bpck6: rework bpck6 protocol driver

[Ondrej Zary <linux@zary.sk>]

On Sunday 19 March 2023 21:02:43 Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 3/18/23 9:55 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> 
> >>> This patch series simplifies bpck6 code, removing ppc6lnx.c file to match
> >>> the simplicity of other protocol drivers. It also converts the direct
> >>> port I/O access to paraport access functions. This conversion revealed that
> >>> there's no 8-bit and 16-bit EPP support in parport_pc so patch 11 implements
> >>> that.
> >>>
> >>> Tested with Backpack CD-RW 222011 and CD-RW 19350.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@zary.sk>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck6.c   | 452 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>>  drivers/ata/pata_parport/ppc6lnx.c | 726 ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>  drivers/parport/parport_pc.c       |  20 +-
> >>>  include/uapi/linux/parport.h       |   3 +
> >>>  4 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 831 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>    OK, it's finally clear I can't keep up with reviewing 32 patches posted
> >> at once...  Luckily, all those patches seem to be dealing with parallel port
> >> control), not the PATA control! Of course, when I volunteered to review the
> >> PATA driver patches, I didn't expect such patch volumes -- I mostly expected
> >> some odd fixes, not a massive driver rework... :-/
> > 
> > So you're going to review the (P)ATA parts (if any) only.
> 
>    I saw no PATA parts in this patcheset...
> 
> > Maybe Sudip (as parport maintainer) could review the parallel port parts?
> 
>    I have no objections! :-)

Looks like Sudip does not care. What needs to be done so this can be merged?

-- 
Ondrej Zary