From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA47C77B7C for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243758AbjD0MpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:45:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56744 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243510AbjD0MpQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:45:16 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C01944A9 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 05:44:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1682599465; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lzwxe1t0ZIgVn70/Tq0NK3rd+W9jKSUTR+PKsGNCcz0=; b=DEZBAv6q+FGH8Kob6BUrgZlPjLDiJTpQ7LZjaH9n87Aj58O/8OSWI/6PyXVq7xEifoi436 F7vrOVWDVyu2ucVc7B0E3Vy59FekkPWpURxOQirySaY1MRQukshP7iPODBPn+Et88IZbjg lzFAfplZ0CQjtRCZZSPwhZHvQzfpTLw= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-478-wpOMRbXWP0Kq_B0-3GXdVw-1; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:44:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wpOMRbXWP0Kq_B0-3GXdVw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D5638123A7; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99FF14171B6; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:44:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ZiyangZhang , Harris James R , Ming Lei , Pavel Begunkov Subject: [PATCH V2 1/7] ublk: kill queuing request by task_work_add Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:44:08 +0800 Message-Id: <20230427124414.319945-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230427124414.319945-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20230427124414.319945-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org task_work_add() is used from early ublk development stage for handling request in batch. However, since commit 7d4a93176e01 ("ublk_drv: don't forward io commands in reserve order"), we can get similar batch processing with io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(), and similar performance data is observed between task_work_add() and io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(). Meantime we can kill one fast code path, which is actually seldom used given it is common to build ublk driver as module. Cc: Pavel Begunkov Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 40 ++-------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c index afbef182820b..068d8b99605b 100644 --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ struct ublk_rq_data { struct llist_node node; - struct callback_head work; }; struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu { @@ -289,14 +288,6 @@ static int ublk_apply_params(struct ublk_device *ub) return 0; } -static inline bool ublk_can_use_task_work(const struct ublk_queue *ubq) -{ - if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK) && - !(ubq->flags & UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK)) - return true; - return false; -} - static inline bool ublk_need_get_data(const struct ublk_queue *ubq) { return ubq->flags & UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA; @@ -851,17 +842,6 @@ static void ublk_rq_task_work_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned issue_flags) ublk_forward_io_cmds(ubq, issue_flags); } -static void ublk_rq_task_work_fn(struct callback_head *work) -{ - struct ublk_rq_data *data = container_of(work, - struct ublk_rq_data, work); - struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(data); - struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data; - unsigned issue_flags = IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED; - - ublk_forward_io_cmds(ubq, issue_flags); -} - static void ublk_queue_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *rq) { struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq); @@ -885,10 +865,6 @@ static void ublk_queue_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *rq) */ if (unlikely(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED)) { ublk_abort_io_cmds(ubq); - } else if (ublk_can_use_task_work(ubq)) { - if (task_work_add(ubq->ubq_daemon, &data->work, - TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI)) - ublk_abort_io_cmds(ubq); } else { struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = io->cmd; struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(cmd); @@ -944,19 +920,9 @@ static int ublk_init_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, void *driver_data, return 0; } -static int ublk_init_rq(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *req, - unsigned int hctx_idx, unsigned int numa_node) -{ - struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req); - - init_task_work(&data->work, ublk_rq_task_work_fn); - return 0; -} - static const struct blk_mq_ops ublk_mq_ops = { .queue_rq = ublk_queue_rq, .init_hctx = ublk_init_hctx, - .init_request = ublk_init_rq, }; static int ublk_ch_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) @@ -1783,10 +1749,8 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd) */ ub->dev_info.flags &= UBLK_F_ALL; - if (!IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK)) - ub->dev_info.flags |= UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK; - - ub->dev_info.flags |= UBLK_F_CMD_IOCTL_ENCODE; + ub->dev_info.flags |= UBLK_F_CMD_IOCTL_ENCODE | + UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK; /* We are not ready to support zero copy */ ub->dev_info.flags &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY; -- 2.40.0