From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
To: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@canonical.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>,
kernel@gpiccoli.net, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 18:51:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21d2ab66-4295-6b69-ef85-d798f3406fbd@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW6ahmkUhCgns=9WHPXSvYefB0Gmr1oB7gdZiD86sKyHFg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/05/2019 18:07, Song Liu wrote:
>> [...]
>> I understand this could in theory affects all the RAID levels, but in
>> practice I don't think it'll happen. RAID0 is the only "blind" mode of
>> RAID, in the sense it's the only one that doesn't care at all with
>> failures. In fact, this was the origin of my other thread [0], regarding
>> the change of raid0's behavior in error cases..because it currently does
>> not care with members being removed and rely only in filesystem failures
>> (after submitting many BIOs to the removed device).
>>
>> That said, in this change I've only took care of raid0, since in my
>> understanding the other levels won't submit BIOs to dead devices; we can
>> experiment that to see if it's true.
>
> Could you please run a quick test with raid5? I am wondering whether
> some race condition could get us into similar crash. If we cannot easily
> trigger the bug, we can process with this version.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
Hi Song, I've tested both RAID5 (with 3 disks, removing one at a time),
and also RAID 1 (2 disks, also removing one at a time); no issues
observed in kernel 5.1. We can see one interesting message in kernel
log: "super_written gets error=10", which corresponds to md detecting
the error (bi_status == BLK_STS_IOERROR) and instantly failing the
write, making FS read-only.
So, I think really the issue happens only in RAID0, which writes
"blindly" to its components.
Let me know your thoughts - thanks again for your input!
Cheers,
Guilherme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 22:37 [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request() Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-04-30 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-05-06 16:50 ` Song Liu
2019-05-06 18:48 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-05-06 21:07 ` Song Liu
2019-05-07 21:51 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]
2019-05-08 9:29 ` Wols Lists
2019-05-08 14:52 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-05-08 16:52 ` Wols Lists
2019-05-17 16:19 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-05-20 16:23 ` Song Liu
2019-05-20 19:25 ` Guilherme Piccoli
2019-04-30 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request() Bart Van Assche
2019-05-17 3:33 ` Eric Ren
2019-05-17 16:17 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-05-20 2:43 ` Eric Ren
2019-05-17 22:04 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21d2ab66-4295-6b69-ef85-d798f3406fbd@canonical.com \
--to=gpiccoli@canonical.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gavin.guo@canonical.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).