From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B675CC32771 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FA72084D for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FUtAoghN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728911AbgAOVHn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:07:43 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:30660 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728903AbgAOVHn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:07:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579122462; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LdDxJ4TaImd6q6K/Midoj6ftwyCpFTFDZIo2bBl0h+Y=; b=FUtAoghNpFoQ/pYbsQUaBJaAJsazv9ag2BvveRlmncoMeJesW4AJko+8Min24MZDyuMebx fNcSzqYRTti16HEzQolEkEDE2xvU5EdekBjQjf9xKr5+diC0RUS8x9whP4F1g+xlCJBBKn HqS3Zx3chhhN7SbN0AXHi13EA41nJvs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-248-Nm7f_jTgN36eBJiQzWf3_A-1; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:07:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Nm7f_jTgN36eBJiQzWf3_A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A13801E6C; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-120-52.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.52]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A721000329; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <157909503552.20155.3030058841911628518.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Casey Schaufler , Stephen Smalley , Nicolas Dichtel , Ian Kent , Christian Brauner , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-block , LSM List , linux-fsdevel , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications [ver #3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24898.1579122454.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:07:34 +0000 Message-ID: <24899.1579122454@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I no longer hate the implementation, but I do want to see the > actual user space users come out of the woodwork and try this out for > their use cases. I'll see if I can get someone to help fix this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551648 for the KEYRING kerberos cache using notifications. Note that the primary thrust of this BZ is with KCM cache, but it affects KEYRING as well. Also, I'll poke Greg, since he was interested in using it for USB notifications. David