From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] optimize nvme single segment I/O
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:44:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <302780ee-8721-2039-63b9-0d64bf3b519b@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190321231037.25104-1-hch@lst.de>
On 3/21/19 5:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with all the discussion on small I/O performance lately I thought
> it was time off to dust my old idea to optimize this path a bit
> by avoiding to build a scatterlist. I've only done very basic
> testing because I've been a bit busy, but I thought it might be
> worthwhile to get it out for feedback.
I ran this through some quick testing, and it's a big win for 4k
IOs here. Around an 8% improvement for cases that are CPU bound.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 23:10 [RFC] optimize nvme single segment I/O Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 01/15] block: add a req_bvec helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:07 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-27 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 02/15] block: add a rq_integrity_vec helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:10 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-27 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: add a rq_dma_dir helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-22 13:06 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-27 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-28 10:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-25 5:11 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: add dma_map_bvec helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 05/15] nvme-pci: remove the unused iod->length field Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:14 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 06/15] nvme-pci: remove nvme_init_iod Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:19 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-27 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 07/15] nvme-pci: move the call to nvme_cleanup_cmd out of nvme_unmap_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:21 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 08/15] nvme-pci: merge nvme_free_iod into nvme_unmap_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:22 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 09/15] nvme-pci: only call nvme_unmap_data for requests transferring data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:23 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 10/15] nvme-pci: do not build a scatterlist to map metadata Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:27 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-08-28 9:20 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-12 1:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-12 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 11/15] nvme-pci: split metadata handling from nvme_map_data / nvme_unmap_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:29 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 12/15] nvme-pci: remove the inline scatterlist optimization Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:30 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 13/15] nvme-pci: optimize mapping of small single segment requests Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:36 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 14/15] nvme-pci: optimize mapping single segment requests using SGLs Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:39 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-04-30 14:17 ` Klaus Birkelund
2019-04-30 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-21 23:10 ` [PATCH 15/15] nvme-pci: tidy up nvme_map_data Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-25 5:40 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-03-22 15:44 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-03-27 14:24 ` [RFC] optimize nvme single segment I/O Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-22 17:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-22 18:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=302780ee-8721-2039-63b9-0d64bf3b519b@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).