From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] scsi: core: regression fixes for request batching
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:08:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33a8afce-91a4-2a9d-d822-b12376fd0aa3@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190807144948.28265-1-maier@linux.ibm.com>
On 8/7/19 7:49 AM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> Hi James, Martin, Paolo, Ming,
>
> multipathing with linux-next is broken since 20190723 in our CI.
> The patches fix a memleak and a severe dh/multipath functional regression.
> It would be nice if we could get them to 5.4/scsi-queue and also next.
>
> I would have preferred if such a new feature had used its own
> new copy scsi_mq_ops_batching instead of changing the use case and
> semantics of the existing scsi_mq_ops, because this would likely
> cause less regressions for all the other users not using the new feature.
For both patches:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
BTW, these two patches fix several nvmeof-mp blktests regressions.
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-07 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 14:49 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: core: regression fixes for request batching Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without " Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 23:32 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-08 2:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-09-18 15:09 ` Steffen Maier
2019-09-18 15:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-09-18 15:32 ` Mark Brown
2019-08-08 5:52 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 1:56 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-07 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: fix dh and multipathing " Steffen Maier
2019-08-08 6:02 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 9:08 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-07 16:17 ` [PATCH 0/2] scsi: core: regression fixes for " Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-07 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33a8afce-91a4-2a9d-d822-b12376fd0aa3@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).