From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:41:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e76ffc7-1d71-83b6-ef5b-3986e947e372@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHe3M62agQET6o6O@T590>
Hi Ming,
I'll have a look.
BTW, are you intentionally using scsi_debug over null_blk? null_blk
supports shared sbitmap as well, and performance figures there are
generally higher than scsi_debug for similar fio settings.
Thanks,
john
EOM
>> IOPs
>> mq-deadline usr=21.72%, sys=44.18%, 423K
>> none usr=23.15%, sys=74.01% 450K
> Today I re-run the scsi_debug test on two server hardwares(32cores, dual
> numa nodes), and the CPU utilization issue can be reproduced, follow
> the test result:
>
> 1) randread test on ibm-x3850x6[*] with deadline
>
> |IOPS | FIO CPU util
> ------------------------------------------------
> hosttags | 94k | usr=1.13%, sys=14.75%
> ------------------------------------------------
> non hosttags | 124k | usr=1.12%, sys=10.65%,
>
>
> 2) randread test on ibm-x3850x6[*] with none
> |IOPS | FIO CPU util
> ------------------------------------------------
> hosttags | 120k | usr=0.89%, sys=6.55%
> ------------------------------------------------
> non hosttags | 121k | usr=1.07%, sys=7.35%
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> *:
> - that is the machine Yanhui reported VM cpu utilization increased by 20%
> - kernel: latest linus tree(v5.12-rc7, commit: 7f75285ca57)
> - also run same test on another 32cores machine, IOPS drop isn't
> observed, but CPU utilization is increased obviously
>
> 3) test script
> #/bin/bash
>
> run_fio() {
> RTIME=$1
> JOBS=$2
> DEVS=$3
> BS=$4
>
> QD=64
> BATCH=16
>
> fio --bs=$BS --ioengine=libaio \
> --iodepth=$QD \
> --iodepth_batch_submit=$BATCH \
> --iodepth_batch_complete_min=$BATCH \
> --filename=$DEVS \
> --direct=1 --runtime=$RTIME --numjobs=$JOBS --rw=randread \
> --name=test --group_reporting
> }
>
> SCHED=$1
>
> NRQS=`getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN`
>
> rmmod scsi_debug
> modprobe scsi_debug host_max_queue=128 submit_queues=$NRQS virtual_gb=256
> sleep 2
> DEV=`lsscsi | grep scsi_debug | awk '{print $6}'`
> echo $SCHED >/sys/block/`basename $DEV`/queue/scheduler
> echo 128 >/sys/block/`basename $DEV`/device/queue_depth
> run_fio 20 16 $DEV 8K
>
>
> rmmod scsi_debug
> modprobe scsi_debug max_queue=128 submit_queues=1 virtual_gb=256
> sleep 2
> DEV=`lsscsi | grep scsi_debug | awk '{print $6}'`
> echo $SCHED >/sys/block/`basename $DEV`/queue/scheduler
> echo 128 >/sys/block/`basename $DEV`/device/queue_depth
> run_fio 20 16 $DEV 8k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 7:50 [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:10 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 10:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:42 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 11:12 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 12:06 ` John Garry
2021-04-15 3:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 10:41 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-04-15 12:18 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 15:41 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 0:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 8:29 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 8:39 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 14:59 ` John Garry
2021-04-20 3:06 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20 3:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-20 4:54 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20 6:52 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-20 20:22 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-21 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-23 8:43 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 10:53 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 14:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 15:52 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 16:03 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 17:02 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 23:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 7:52 ` John Garry
2021-04-27 9:11 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 9:37 ` John Garry
2021-04-27 9:52 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 10:15 ` John Garry
2021-07-07 17:06 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 13:59 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 17:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-14 18:19 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 19:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-15 0:58 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e76ffc7-1d71-83b6-ef5b-3986e947e372@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).