From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 12:21:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41b9185d-f780-f08f-dd63-9ad02a6976d4@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010103016.GA22976@ming.t460p>
On 10/10/2019 11:30, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Yes, hisi_sas. So, right, it is single queue today on mainline, but I
>> > manually made it multiqueue on my dev branch just to test this series.
>> > Otherwise I could not test it for that driver.
>> >
>> > My dev branch is here, if interested:
>> > https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commits/private-topic-sas-5.4-mq
> Your conversion shouldn't work given you do not change .can_queue in the
> patch of 'hisi_sas_v3: multiqueue support'.
Ah, I missed that, but I don't think that it will make a difference
really since I'm only using a single disk, so I don't think that
can_queue really comes into play. But....
>
> As discussed before, tags of hisilicon V3 is HBA wide. If you switch
> to real hw queue, each hw queue has to own its independent tags.
> However, that isn't supported by V3 hardware.
I am generating the tag internally in the driver now, so that hostwide
tags issue should not be an issue.
And, to be clear, I am not paying too much attention to performance, but
rather just hotplugging while running IO.
An update on testing:
I did some scripted overnight testing. The script essentially loops like
this:
- online all CPUS
- run fio binded on a limited bunch of CPUs to cover a hctx mask for 1
minute
- offline those CPUs
- wait 1 minute (> SCSI or NVMe timeout)
- and repeat
SCSI is actually quite stable, but NVMe isn't. For NVMe I am finding
some fio processes never dying with IOPS @ 0. I don't see any NVMe
timeout reported. Did you do any NVMe testing of this sort?
Thanks,
John
>
> See previous discussion:
>
> https://marc.info/?t=155928863000001&r=1&w=2
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-10 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-08 4:18 [PATCH V3 0/5] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2019-10-08 4:18 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED Ming Lei
2019-10-08 4:18 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] blk-mq: prepare for draining IO when hctx's all CPUs are offline Ming Lei
2019-10-08 4:18 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] blk-mq: stop to handle IO and drain IO before hctx becomes dead Ming Lei
2019-10-08 17:03 ` John Garry
2019-10-08 4:18 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is dead Ming Lei
2019-10-08 4:18 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler " Ming Lei
2019-10-08 9:06 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug John Garry
2019-10-08 17:15 ` John Garry
2019-10-09 8:39 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-09 8:49 ` John Garry
2019-10-10 10:30 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-10 11:21 ` John Garry [this message]
2019-10-11 8:51 ` John Garry
2019-10-11 11:55 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-11 14:10 ` John Garry
2019-10-14 1:25 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-14 8:29 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41b9185d-f780-f08f-dd63-9ad02a6976d4@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).