Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
	raven@themaw.net, Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications [ver #2]
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:23:04 +0000
Message-ID: <4649.1573150984@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWszYm9=-WEgSbhmGc3DYCvY6q3W4Lezm6YtKnGtRs_5g@mail.gmail.com>

Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:

> > Allow a buffer to be marked such that read() must return the entire buffer
> > in one go or return ENOBUFS.  Multiple buffers can be amalgamated into a
> > single read, but a short read will occur if the next "whole" buffer won't
> > fit.
> >
> > This is useful for watch queue notifications to make sure we don't split a
> > notification across multiple reads, especially given that we need to
> > fabricate an overrun record under some circumstances - and that isn't in
> > the buffers.
> 
> Hmm.  I'm not totally in love with introducing a new error code like
> this for read(), especially if it could affect the kind of pipe that
> is bound to a file in a filesystem.  But maybe it's not a problem.

EMSGSIZE might be better?

David


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07 13:35 [RFC PATCH 00/14] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] uapi: General notification queue definitions " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] security: Add hooks to rule on setting a watch " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] security: Add a hook for the point of notification insertion " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] pipe: Add O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE " David Howells
2019-11-07 18:16   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-07 18:48   ` David Howells
2019-11-08  5:06     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-08  6:42     ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] pipe: Add general notification queue support " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] keys: Add a notification facility " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] Add sample notification program " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications " David Howells
2019-11-07 18:15   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-07 18:23   ` David Howells [this message]
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] pipe: Add notification lossage handling " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] Add a general, global device notification watch list " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] block: Add block layer notifications " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] usb: Add USB subsystem " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] selinux: Implement the watch_key security hook " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks " David Howells
2019-11-07 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] pipe: Add general notification queue support " David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4649.1573150984@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \
		linux-block@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-block

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git