From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xsysace: use platform_get_resource() and platform_get_irq_optional()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:00:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5112b536-ea20-947a-75ab-a535568a45e1@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f668246-e01c-c8d3-b985-53f705054cd0@xilinx.com>
On 30. 10. 20 8:08, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 29. 10. 20 15:22, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/29/20 1:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi Andy,
>>>
>>> On 27. 10. 20 18:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> Use platform_get_resource() to fetch the memory resource and
>>>> platform_get_irq_optional() to get optional IRQ instead of
>>>> open-coded variants.
>>>>
>>>> IRQ is not supposed to be changed at runtime, so there is
>>>> no functional change in ace_fsm_yieldirq().
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand we now take first resources instead of last ones
>>>> to proceed. I can't imagine how broken should be firmware to have
>>>> a garbage in the first resource slots. But if it the case, it needs
>>>> to be documented.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/block/xsysace.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xsysace.c b/drivers/block/xsysace.c
>>>> index 8d581c7536fb..eb8ef65778c3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/block/xsysace.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/xsysace.c
>>>> @@ -443,22 +443,27 @@ static void ace_fix_driveid(u16 *id)
>>>> #define ACE_FSM_NUM_STATES 11
>>>>
>>>> /* Set flag to exit FSM loop and reschedule tasklet */
>>>> -static inline void ace_fsm_yield(struct ace_device *ace)
>>>> +static inline void ace_fsm_yieldpoll(struct ace_device *ace)
>>>> {
>>>> - dev_dbg(ace->dev, "ace_fsm_yield()\n");
>>>> tasklet_schedule(&ace->fsm_tasklet);
>>>> ace->fsm_continue_flag = 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline void ace_fsm_yield(struct ace_device *ace)
>>>> +{
>>>> + dev_dbg(ace->dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>>>> + ace_fsm_yieldpoll(ace);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /* Set flag to exit FSM loop and wait for IRQ to reschedule tasklet */
>>>> static inline void ace_fsm_yieldirq(struct ace_device *ace)
>>>> {
>>>> dev_dbg(ace->dev, "ace_fsm_yieldirq()\n");
>>>>
>>>> - if (!ace->irq)
>>>> - /* No IRQ assigned, so need to poll */
>>>> - tasklet_schedule(&ace->fsm_tasklet);
>>>> - ace->fsm_continue_flag = 0;
>>>> + if (ace->irq > 0)
>>>> + ace->fsm_continue_flag = 0;
>>>> + else
>>>> + ace_fsm_yieldpoll(ace);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static bool ace_has_next_request(struct request_queue *q)
>>>> @@ -1053,12 +1058,12 @@ static int ace_setup(struct ace_device *ace)
>>>> ACE_CTRL_DATABUFRDYIRQ | ACE_CTRL_ERRORIRQ);
>>>>
>>>> /* Now we can hook up the irq handler */
>>>> - if (ace->irq) {
>>>> + if (ace->irq > 0) {
>>>> rc = request_irq(ace->irq, ace_interrupt, 0, "systemace", ace);
>>>> if (rc) {
>>>> /* Failure - fall back to polled mode */
>>>> dev_err(ace->dev, "request_irq failed\n");
>>>> - ace->irq = 0;
>>>> + ace->irq = rc;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1115,7 @@ static void ace_teardown(struct ace_device *ace)
>>>>
>>>> tasklet_kill(&ace->fsm_tasklet);
>>>>
>>>> - if (ace->irq)
>>>> + if (ace->irq > 0)
>>>> free_irq(ace->irq, ace);
>>>>
>>>> iounmap(ace->baseaddr);
>>>> @@ -1123,11 +1128,6 @@ static int ace_alloc(struct device *dev, int id, resource_size_t physaddr,
>>>> int rc;
>>>> dev_dbg(dev, "ace_alloc(%p)\n", dev);
>>>>
>>>> - if (!physaddr) {
>>>> - rc = -ENODEV;
>>>> - goto err_noreg;
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> /* Allocate and initialize the ace device structure */
>>>> ace = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ace_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!ace) {
>>>> @@ -1153,7 +1153,6 @@ static int ace_alloc(struct device *dev, int id, resource_size_t physaddr,
>>>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>>>> kfree(ace);
>>>> err_alloc:
>>>> -err_noreg:
>>>> dev_err(dev, "could not initialize device, err=%i\n", rc);
>>>> return rc;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1176,10 +1175,11 @@ static void ace_free(struct device *dev)
>>>>
>>>> static int ace_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> - resource_size_t physaddr = 0;
>>>> int bus_width = ACE_BUS_WIDTH_16; /* FIXME: should not be hard coded */
>>>> + resource_size_t physaddr;
>>>> + struct resource *res;
>>>> u32 id = dev->id;
>>>> - int irq = 0;
>>>> + int irq;
>>>> int i;
>>>>
>>>> dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "ace_probe(%p)\n", dev);
>>>> @@ -1190,12 +1190,15 @@ static int ace_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>>> if (of_find_property(dev->dev.of_node, "8-bit", NULL))
>>>> bus_width = ACE_BUS_WIDTH_8;
>>>>
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < dev->num_resources; i++) {
>>>> - if (dev->resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
>>>> - physaddr = dev->resource[i].start;
>>>> - if (dev->resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ)
>>>> - irq = dev->resource[i].start;
>>>> - }
>>>> + res = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>>> + if (!res)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + physaddr = res->start;
>>>> + if (!physaddr)
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> + irq = platform_get_irq_optional(dev, 0);
>>>>
>>>> /* Call the bus-independent setup code */
>>>> return ace_alloc(&dev->dev, id, physaddr, irq, bus_width);
>>>>
>>>
>>> This driver is quite old and obsolete. I am fine with whatever patch and
>>> I am also fine with marking driver as BROKEN or remove it because I am
>>> not aware about any user.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>>
>> How about I queue this one up for 5.10, and then we can queue a removal
>> patch for 5.11? Or at least schedule it for removal.
>>
>
> Works for me. I will send removal patch for 5.11.
patch sent.
M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-09 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 17:11 [PATCH v1] xsysace: use platform_get_resource() and platform_get_irq_optional() Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-29 7:18 ` Michal Simek
2020-10-29 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-30 7:08 ` Michal Simek
2020-11-09 11:00 ` Michal Simek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-04 14:45 Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5112b536-ea20-947a-75ab-a535568a45e1@xilinx.com \
--to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).