From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com, chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com,
damien.lemoal@wdc.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
asml.silence@gmail.com, ajay.joshi@wdc.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com,
luoshijie1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: revert pushing the final release of request_queue to a workqueue.
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 20:09:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51b4cd75-2b19-3e4d-7ead-409c77c44b70@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206111052.45356-1-yukuai3@huawei.com>
On 2020-02-06 03:10, yu kuai wrote:
> commit dc9edc44de6c ("block: Fix a blk_exit_rl() regression") pushed the
> final release of request_queue to a workqueue, witch is not necessary
> since commit 1e9364283764 ("blk-sysfs: Rework documention of
> __blk_release_queue").
I think the second commit reference is wrong. Did you perhaps want to
refer to commit 7b36a7189fc3 ("block: don't call ioc_exit_icq() with the
queue lock held for blk-mq")? That is the commit that removed the
locking from blk_release_queue() and that makes it safe to revert commit
dc9edc44de6c.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 11:10 [PATCH] block: revert pushing the final release of request_queue to a workqueue yu kuai
2020-02-07 4:09 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-02-07 6:02 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 7:10 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 9:30 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-07 10:26 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 12:24 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-07 13:04 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-08 6:12 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-10 1:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-10 2:13 ` yukuai (C)
2020-02-10 2:32 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-10 3:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-10 8:49 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51b4cd75-2b19-3e4d-7ead-409c77c44b70@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=ajay.joshi@wdc.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoshijie1@huawei.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).