linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brookxu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
To: paolo.valente@linaro.org, axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/8] bfq: keep the minimun bandwidth for be_class
Date: Mon,  8 Mar 2021 20:00:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60007c99598dc26b0e0c495120d829f96ea38dd2.1615203034.git.brookxu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1615203034.git.brookxu@tencent.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1615203034.git.brookxu@tencent.com>

From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>

From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>

rt_class will preempt other classes, which may cause other
classes to starve to death. At present, idle_class has
alleviated the starvation problem through the minimum
bandwidth mechanism. Similarly, we should do the same for
be_class.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c |  2 +-
 block/bfq-iosched.h |  9 +++++----
 block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index ea9d7f6f4e3d..b639cdbb4192 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -6539,7 +6539,7 @@ static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group *root_group,
 	root_group->rq_pos_tree = RB_ROOT;
 	for (i = 0; i < BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES; i++)
 		root_group->sched_data.service_tree[i] = BFQ_SERVICE_TREE_INIT;
-	root_group->sched_data.bfq_class_idle_last_service = jiffies;
+	root_group->sched_data.class_timeout_last_check = jiffies;
 }
 
 static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index a6f98e9e14b5..2fe7456aa7bc 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include "blk-cgroup-rwstat.h"
 
 #define BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES	3
-#define BFQ_CL_IDLE_TIMEOUT	(HZ/5)
+#define BFQ_CLASS_TIMEOUT	(HZ/5)
 
 #define BFQ_MIN_WEIGHT			1
 #define BFQ_MAX_WEIGHT			1000
@@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ struct bfq_sched_data {
 	struct bfq_entity *next_in_service;
 	/* array of service trees, one per ioprio_class */
 	struct bfq_service_tree service_tree[BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES];
-	/* last time CLASS_IDLE was served */
-	unsigned long bfq_class_idle_last_service;
-
+	/* last time the class timeout was checked */
+	unsigned long class_timeout_last_check;
+	/* the position to start class timeout check next time */
+	unsigned int next_class_index;
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
index 5ff0028920a2..0d10eb3ed555 100644
--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -1435,6 +1435,34 @@ __bfq_lookup_next_entity(struct bfq_service_tree *st, bool in_service)
 	return entity;
 }
 
+static int bfq_select_next_class(struct bfq_sched_data *sd)
+{
+	struct bfq_service_tree *st = sd->service_tree;
+	int i, class_idx, next_class = 0;
+	unsigned long last_check;
+
+	/*
+	 * we needed to guarantee a minimum bandwidth for each class (if
+	 * there is some active entity in this class). This should also
+	 * mitigate priority-inversion problems in case a low priority
+	 * task is holding file system resources.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES; i++) {
+		class_idx = (sd->next_class_index + i) % BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES;
+		last_check = sd->class_timeout_last_check;
+		if (time_is_before_jiffies(last_check + BFQ_CLASS_TIMEOUT)) {
+			sd->class_timeout_last_check = jiffies;
+			if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&(st + class_idx)->active)) {
+				next_class = class_idx++;
+				class_idx %= BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES;
+				sd->next_class_index = class_idx;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	return next_class;
+}
+
 /**
  * bfq_lookup_next_entity - return the first eligible entity in @sd.
  * @sd: the sched_data.
@@ -1448,24 +1476,8 @@ static struct bfq_entity *bfq_lookup_next_entity(struct bfq_sched_data *sd,
 						 bool expiration)
 {
 	struct bfq_service_tree *st = sd->service_tree;
-	struct bfq_service_tree *idle_class_st = st + (BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES - 1);
 	struct bfq_entity *entity = NULL;
-	int class_idx = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Choose from idle class, if needed to guarantee a minimum
-	 * bandwidth to this class (and if there is some active entity
-	 * in idle class). This should also mitigate
-	 * priority-inversion problems in case a low priority task is
-	 * holding file system resources.
-	 */
-	if (time_is_before_jiffies(sd->bfq_class_idle_last_service +
-				   BFQ_CL_IDLE_TIMEOUT)) {
-		if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&idle_class_st->active))
-			class_idx = BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES - 1;
-		/* About to be served if backlogged, or not yet backlogged */
-		sd->bfq_class_idle_last_service = jiffies;
-	}
+	int class_idx = bfq_select_next_class(sd);
 
 	/*
 	 * Find the next entity to serve for the highest-priority
-- 
2.30.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08 12:00 [RFC PATCH 0/8] bfq: introduce bfq.ioprio for cgroup brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] bfq: limit the IO depth of idle_class to 1 brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` brookxu [this message]
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] bfq: expire bfqq if a higher priority class is waiting brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] bfq: introduce bfq.ioprio for cgroup brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] bfq: convert the type of bfq_group.bfqd to bfq_data* brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] bfq: remove unnecessary initialization logic brookxu
2021-03-08 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] bfq: optimize the calculation of bfq_weight_to_ioprio() brookxu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60007c99598dc26b0e0c495120d829f96ea38dd2.1615203034.git.brookxu@tencent.com \
    --to=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).