From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7169EC4CECD for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443BE214AF for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Jy6+Fzxu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389046AbfIPPVF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:21:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:42500 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388609AbfIPPVF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:21:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q14so39300879wrm.9 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:21:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=K5n01uhQ5HwxlBE5M/2zmjIiad/mSltxdBurQPag48E=; b=Jy6+FzxuA5xspP87WcsXSOV4KOdYZWkwZV9U8INYadGh7JZSwRWH/gbT0hmx1AVdJp c3z4qE9I4ZBu1OjPKIDmA/xJwG31JNjYTHNY62FngQXJj5Ch5iIf3UvshZV0IaFH7yuh v9qvTI6LiL9JqE+hz8CfexVxz2uXwVd5QIAsfhXlMbsTH/wDD/OOX1+fX6e0lOq7Dc6o kpe/jGOTZFtoFFaRWaeYDiih2pLyUhyfw4aG8BiagqvcX5YT1xfGUnnl72ARPECAPPBr BSGYMoyvKuKfPeDNJ+h/hWOJcuvDR9nehhvCOzGJkCoKRRPU+l6z5hvmHnbNmglWZkkH 9olg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=K5n01uhQ5HwxlBE5M/2zmjIiad/mSltxdBurQPag48E=; b=YsUapId+rqlm+kuTCk3uWfJ6Va6jsMxMHOddYXpmQG5J7cPEqjjnK/Xy8KPyx8bzny qYwPyfbX8dGG+Rg4IZO+goZPb0xl4iw7n9MSR0z6B6wlggbL0cDMNViXIR8IwfBQgzZm DKdDn37iqyq/ScQXn6VZhE5CstGqyXk8pWJfMZa6t0hYXuisklBHoWbcC/XuXi8QWgtV +otwRU+6zB1LCCMK8xabkydZt91jvhQxXsH5wA4WCAAa030fuaMNUH45KJelIPPSsa+K kNyRZTHe/qNTsbkNyETbtZmxOYzrfTiCW3dedv3tDqweb0VwXUsnzH01D0+OhNleE0zK EECA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWa0GiC4hkzZcWnwcgVXXltofHXfq8tWBAhDpM6sB4R9FphbOeH HGKvqGFSiXtMuKNPLDHJbi0zNA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyjxEqp9sHAmo5kttc6Y0BlvcD5LMImSzPduV+19RimNQXROmwgEraX+NhAEljzg9KcrdGXzA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4b4e:: with SMTP id w14mr232550wrs.191.1568647263455; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (146-241-102-115.dyn.eolo.it. [146.241.102.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm7151337wrv.10.2019.09.16.08.21.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] block, bfq: remove bfq prefix from cgroups filenames From: Paolo Valente In-Reply-To: <20190916151643.GC3084169@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:21:01 +0200 Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block , linux-kernel , Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , noreply-spamdigest via bfq-iosched , Oleksandr Natalenko , cgroups@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <64329DDB-FFF4-4709-83B1-39D5E6BF6AB6@linaro.org> References: <20190909073117.20625-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <80C56C11-DA21-4036-9006-2F459ACE9A8C@linaro.org> <1F3898DA-C61F-4FA7-B586-F0FA0CAF5069@linaro.org> <20190916151643.GC3084169@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> To: Tejun Heo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > Il giorno 16 set 2019, alle ore 17:16, Tejun Heo ha = scritto: >=20 > Hello, Paolo. >=20 > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:07:29PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >> Tejun, could you put your switch-off-io-cost code into a standalone >> patch, so that I can put it together with this one in a complete >> series? >=20 > It was more of a proof-of-concept / example, so the note in the email > that the code is free to be modified / used any way you see fit. That > said, if you like it as it is, I can surely prep it as a standalone > patch. >=20 AFAICT your proposal contains no evident error. Plus, no one seems to have complained about the idea (regardless from the exact implementation). So I guess the best next step is to go for it. Thanks, Paolo > Thanks. >=20 > --=20 > tejun